thanks again mike. well, most of our software is already message driven,
but we still need to "group" information if we want to; ex: search from
all our clients databases for some value in a model that's shared
between them.
thanks a lot,
richard.
On 04/08/2014 12:07 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Apr 8, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Richard Gerd Kuesters
wrote:
> thanks mike. i know it's a vague question, but that just the point: i don't
> know the answer because it can be both :)
>
> let me clarify: assuming the application can be self hosted (in our ift),
> hence also multi-tenancy can be
thanks mike. i know it's a vague question, but that just the point: i
don't know the answer because it can be both :)
let me clarify: assuming the application can be self hosted (in our
ift), hence also multi-tenancy can be used for multiple clients. if not,
the same codebase would run in the
this is a vague and open ended question, is this a multi-tenancy application?
does each client have their own database? or is that the question?if its
multi tenancy, Id probably give each client a different database, why not?
On Apr 4, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Richard Gerd Kuesters
wrot
perhaps this would help?
http://techspot.zzzeek.org/2012/01/11/django-style-database-routers-in-sqlalchemy/
i'm willing to use different schemas to my question. if anyone have a
better idea, let me know :)
best regards,
richard.
On 04/04/2014 01:58 PM, Richard Gerd Kuesters wrote:
hi all!
