Does anyone know where I can get a binary executable
of sqlite for the FreeBSD 4.8 platform. This is what
my ISP runs and I don't get Telnet/SSH access with my
account, so I can't compile. I have Linux and Windows
boxes.
Thanks.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance:
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Welgehausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sqlite] tcl/sqlite executing code on failed transaction
You should take a look at tcl's catch command. You could
put all your SQLite code
You should take a look at tcl's catch command. You could
put all your SQLite code in one catch command,
if {[catch {
db eval begin ;# or maybe {begin on conflict rollback}
db eval {... }
db eval {... }
db eval {... }
db eval commit} err]} {
doSomething $err
}
or
- Original Message -
From: "Nate Bargmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A plugin style of architecture seems much better than a bloated
> all-in-one approach.
Agreed, a plug-inn mechanism or lib-sqlite-bloated would do the job just as
well.
On 7 Feb 2004 at 12:10, Rene wrote:
> > How old is 2.5.6 version?
>
> july 7. 2002
> http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/timeline?d=3000=2004-Feb-07=0==0=1=1=1=1
>
> i'm just wondering what strategy will be if database format changes in the
> future, do we depend on external utility then?
I think
hi,
yes, user defined function / callback functionality is there. and of course,
user defined functions are great! but i think sqlite should also (try to)
compete with alternatives.
for some platforms (scripting languages like php) udf may just be (too)
slow. i don't mind nor care adding more of
> If you need a special function foo() use the extension api of sqlite.
This is perfectly correct!
Few bytes are the footprint of a quick and small database.
Thats is more or less the definition.
Code that is rarely used and also, does not provide a
core function in sqlite, should simply not
7 matches
Mail list logo
