Re: [sqlite] Building sqlite 3.2.8 on redhat 9 (off list)

2006-01-03 Thread Lloyd Thomas
The precompiled version did work. I was just trying to compile it myself to get experience building a linux box. Lloyd - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 1:29 PM Subject: Re: [sqlite] Building sqlite 3.2.8 on redhat 9 (off list) "Lloy

RE: [sqlite] LIMIT keyword does work in an UPDATE statement

2006-01-03 Thread test mjom
Dennis, it works perfectly well, so thank you for your quick and relevant solution. test mjom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Hi, i'm beginning with SQLite and it seems that the keyword LIMIT is not supported on an UPDATE statement. Does anybody would have a workaround to update only the very fi

Re: [sqlite] LIMIT keyword does work in an UPDATE statement

2006-01-03 Thread Derrell . Lipman
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:15:17AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> test mjom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > create table tbl1 ( id integer primary key autoincrement, ref >> > integer, sts varchar(16)); >> > insert into tbl1 (ref,sts) val

Re: [sqlite] LIMIT keyword does work in an UPDATE statement

2006-01-03 Thread Dennis Cote
test mjom wrote: Hi, i'm beginning with SQLite and it seems that the keyword LIMIT is not supported on an UPDATE statement. Does anybody would have a workaround to update only the very first row matching the search criteria ? Ex : create table tbl1 ( id integer primary key autoincreme

Re: [sqlite] LIMIT keyword does work in an UPDATE statement

2006-01-03 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:15:17AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > test mjom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > create table tbl1 ( id integer primary key autoincrement, ref > > integer, sts varchar(16)); > > insert into tbl1 (ref,sts) values (10, 'ready' ); > > insert into tbl1 (ref,sts

Re: [sqlite] LIMIT keyword does work in an UPDATE statement

2006-01-03 Thread Dennis Cote
test mjom wrote: Hi, i'm beginning with SQLite and it seems that the keyword LIMIT is not supported on an UPDATE statement. Does anybody would have a workaround to update only the very first row matching the search criteria ? Ex : create table tbl1 ( id integer primary key autoincreme

Re: [sqlite] LIMIT keyword does work in an UPDATE statement

2006-01-03 Thread Derrell . Lipman
test mjom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > create table tbl1 ( id integer primary key autoincrement, ref > integer, sts varchar(16)); > insert into tbl1 (ref,sts) values (10, 'ready' ); > insert into tbl1 (ref,sts) values (20, 'ready' ); insert into tbl1 > (ref,sts) values (30, 'ready' );

[sqlite] LIMIT keyword does work in an UPDATE statement

2006-01-03 Thread test mjom
Hi, i'm beginning with SQLite and it seems that the keyword LIMIT is not supported on an UPDATE statement. Does anybody would have a workaround to update only the very first row matching the search criteria ? Ex : create table tbl1 ( id integer primary key autoincrement, ref in

[sqlite] 3.2.7 test failure

2006-01-03 Thread Avner Levy
Hi, I've downloaded the 3.2.7 source and built it (on windows). Then I run the tcl test suite and got the following errors: malloc-10.105... Error: table abc already exists malloc-10.106... Error: table abc already exists malloc-10.107... Error: table abc already exists ... ... Error: table abc a

Re: [sqlite] Building sqlite 3.2.8 on redhat 9 (off list)

2006-01-03 Thread drh
"Lloyd Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Kimball > Your right about having a little experience. I am > just running into error after error installing apps, but I'm learnoing > slowly. Anyway, I was trying to install the sqlite support for another > application I

Re: [sqlite] undelete records?

2006-01-03 Thread drh
Kimball Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an sqlite 2.1 format database file with records in it that > have been marked deleted (I believe the term for this is that their > pages are on the freelist) > Is there any simple way to get these records back? Or are they gone > forever? > A

Re: [sqlite] Building sqlite 3.2.8 on redhat 9 (off list)

2006-01-03 Thread Arjen Markus
Lloyd Thomas wrote: > > Thanks Kimball > Your right about having a little experience. I am > just running into error after error installing apps, but I'm learnoing > slowly. Anyway, I was trying to install the sqlite support for another > application I want to use and as a

Re: [sqlite] Building sqlite 3.2.8 on redhat 9 (off list)

2006-01-03 Thread Lloyd Thomas
Thanks Kimball Your right about having a little experience. I am just running into error after error installing apps, but I'm learnoing slowly. Anyway, I was trying to install the sqlite support for another application I want to use and as a side issue it seems to have in