Re: [sqlite] Mac OS

2006-02-14 Thread Darren Duncan
At 11:32 AM +0600 2/15/06, Kirill wrote: Whether will be SqlLite in the future and under Mac OS if there will be that as soon? SQLite runs under Mac OS X right now, and has for a long time. A version is even bundled with X.4 Tiger. -- Darren Duncan

[sqlite] Mac OS

2006-02-14 Thread Kirill
Whether will be SqlLite in the future and under Mac OS if there will be that as soon?

RE: Re[2]: [sqlite] To whom to inform on a bug?

2006-02-14 Thread Robert Simpson
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Schirlinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:45 PM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: Re: Re[2]: [sqlite] To whom to inform on a bug? > > I tried the data you mentioned in SQLite Explorer and the SQL > statemen worked

Re: Re[2]: [sqlite] To whom to inform on a bug?

2006-02-14 Thread Chris Schirlinger
I tried the data you mentioned in SQLite Explorer and the SQL statemen worked correctlyt: > select * from tResult where tex like '%ra%' returned the expected record perfectly Here is the output of the command line test SQLite version 3.3.3 Enter ".help" for instructions sqlite> .schema CREA

Re[2]: [sqlite] To whom to inform on a bug?

2006-02-14 Thread Kirill
sorry :( >> version: >> 3.3.4 or 3.x >> >> System test: >> Win2003(NTFS) >> >> Script: >> select * from tResult where tex like '%ra%' >> result = 0 >> >> select tex from tResult where id = 3229 >> tex = "...Oracle..." >> >> Soft on broblem: >> sqlite3explorer, >> and my soft >

Re: [sqlite] To whom to inform on a bug?

2006-02-14 Thread drh
Kirill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > version: > 3.3.4 or 3.x > > System test: > Win2003(NTFS) > > Script: > select * from tResult where tex like '%ra%' > result = 0 > > select tex from tResult where id = 3229 > tex = "...Oracle..." > > Soft on broblem: > sqlite3explorer, > and m

Re[2]: [sqlite] To whom to inform on a bug?

2006-02-14 Thread Kirill
version: 3.3.4 or 3.x System test: Win2003(NTFS) Script: select * from tResult where tex like '%ra%' result = 0 select tex from tResult where id = 3229 tex = "...Oracle..." Soft on broblem: sqlite3explorer, and my soft sample db: http://www.aidagw.com/files/dba.zip dhc> ht

Re: [sqlite] To whom to inform on a bug?

2006-02-14 Thread drh
Kirill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello > > select * from tResult where tex like '%ra%' > result = 0 > > select tex from tResult where id = 3229 > tex = "...Oracle..." > http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/tktnew Hints: Unless you provide more information that you have shown above, your ticket w

[sqlite] To whom to inform on a bug?

2006-02-14 Thread Kirill
hello select * from tResult where tex like '%ra%' result = 0 select tex from tResult where id = 3229 tex = "...Oracle..." bag? -- Kirill

Re: [sqlite] :memory: and sessions with PHP

2006-02-14 Thread drh
"Robert Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PHP Sessions are similar to session in ASP, ASP.Net, etc. Objects within > the session are serialised into a stream and stored in the specified storage > medium. By Default, PHP stores sessions in a file in the /tmp directory, > identified by a unique

RE: [sqlite] :memory: and sessions with PHP

2006-02-14 Thread Robert Foster
Comments below... Robert Foster General Manager Mountain Visions P/L http://mountainvisions.com.au -Original Message- From: Jay Sprenkle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2006 8:38 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] :memory: and sessions with PHP

Re: [sqlite] :memory: and sessions with PHP

2006-02-14 Thread Jay Sprenkle
> You can also write custom session handlers, allowing you to store the > session anywhere else including a database. There is some documentation on > the Zend.com site for using the Session api, but it's simply a matter of > writing some functions with specific names, and hooking them in via the

RE: [sqlite] :memory: and sessions with PHP

2006-02-14 Thread Robert Foster
PHP Sessions are similar to session in ASP, ASP.Net, etc. Objects within the session are serialised into a stream and stored in the specified storage medium. By Default, PHP stores sessions in a file in the /tmp directory, identified by a unique filename that is stored in a cookie on the browser

[sqlite] Update to Object Builder announcement

2006-02-14 Thread Clay Dowling
I light of Jay's comments about being unclear what Object Builder does, I've added an additional page to cover that very concept at http://www.ceamus.com/objbuilder/what.html Anyone with more questions, feel free to hit me with them, on list or off. And definitely feel free to use this code in yo

Re: [sqlite] :memory: and sessions with PHP

2006-02-14 Thread Kervin L. Pierre
Hello, I think the problem is that PHP uses a file-based session serialization. Therefore anything that cannot be saved to a file and returned ( eg. you can't do this with file handles, etc. ) cannot be saved in session scope in PHP as it is implemented by default. There is the 'mm' extension (

Re: [sqlite] :memory: and sessions with PHP

2006-02-14 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:31:17AM +1300, CrazyChris wrote: > We may be at crossed paths... I'm wanting to save the :memory: database to > the session, not the other way round, so that when the 2nd page loads, the > :memory: database can be recreated and available as it was on the last page > load

RE: [sqlite] :memory: and sessions with PHP

2006-02-14 Thread CrazyChris
We may be at crossed paths... I'm wanting to save the :memory: database to the session, not the other way round, so that when the 2nd page loads, the :memory: database can be recreated and available as it was on the last page load. The advantage is that after some time, the session is deleted auto

[sqlite] Supported unary operators

2006-02-14 Thread Jens Axel Søgaard
The listed supported unary operators listed at are -+!~ However, in the test suite it seems that "not" is also supported: test_expr expr-1.36 {i1=1, i2=0}

Re: [sqlite] Simple ATTACH/memory database question

2006-02-14 Thread Kervin L. Pierre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this right? You are doing a separate CREATE TABLE for each message? That's going to be the source of your problem. I think Yes we are. I tried a message/row design early on but I could not count on it being behaving well. The problem was fitting Outlook's intern

Re: [sqlite] Simple ATTACH/memory database question

2006-02-14 Thread drh
"Kervin L. Pierre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How did you implement full text indexing? > I though sqlite did not support full text > index, am I wrong? SQLite does not have *automatic* full-text indexing. But it is easy enough to index the full text of an email message yourself in applicatio

[sqlite] :memory: databases

2006-02-14 Thread Mateus Cordeiro Inssa
Hi, Is it possible to use an :memory: database with a preallocated memory area ? The locking mechanism could still use files, no problem. Or no locking (and I provide the locking mechanism). I have an application with a 5GB shared memory (with the SHM_HUGETLB flag - Linux) and I do all de

Re: [sqlite] Simple ATTACH/memory database question

2006-02-14 Thread Kervin L. Pierre
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm reading and replying to this message using an SQLite-backed email client See That's very interesting... All incoming and archival emails are stored as BLOBs in a table. The full text of messages is indexed. It is all very fast and I haven't had to do anything s

Re: [sqlite] Simple ATTACH/memory database question

2006-02-14 Thread drh
Andrew Piskorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:16:14AM -0500, Kervin L. Pierre wrote: > > > We are getting ready to start using in- memory database to cache > > sqlite reads/writes in effort to improve speed. For background, > > > Since we read much more than we write,

Re: [sqlite] Simple ATTACH/memory database question

2006-02-14 Thread Jay Sprenkle
> We are getting ready to start using in- > memory database to cache sqlite reads/writes > in effort to improve speed. For background, > the application is an email client. > > The way we envision the caching working is > that we have a mirror copy of any table in > use in memory. The tables are

Re: [sqlite] Simple ATTACH/memory database question

2006-02-14 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:16:14AM -0500, Kervin L. Pierre wrote: > We are getting ready to start using in- memory database to cache > sqlite reads/writes in effort to improve speed. For background, > Since we read much more than we write, reading from memory should > improve. Shouldn't SQLite'

[sqlite] Simple ATTACH/memory database question

2006-02-14 Thread Kervin L. Pierre
Hello, We are getting ready to start using in- memory database to cache sqlite reads/writes in effort to improve speed. For background, the application is an email client. The way we envision the caching working is that we have a mirror copy of any table in use in memory. The tables are small

Re: [sqlite] Useful SQLite tool?

2006-02-14 Thread Jay Sprenkle
> I think that I've previously mentioned my Object Builder code on this > list. If I haven't, you might want to take a look at > http://www.ceamus.com/objbuilder/ > > Object Builder is a tool to automate the creation of Active Record classes > for reading and writing data from databases. The incl

[sqlite] Useful SQLite tool?

2006-02-14 Thread Clay Dowling
I think that I've previously mentioned my Object Builder code on this list. If I haven't, you might want to take a look at http://www.ceamus.com/objbuilder/ Object Builder is a tool to automate the creation of Active Record classes for reading and writing data from databases. The included exampl