Thanks
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Igor Tandetnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Artem Yankovskiy
>
> > wrote:
> > > I know about DROP TABLE.
> > > I have not knew when compatibility DROP TABLE
> and
> > > SELECT...
> > >
> > > DROP TABLE (select name from sqlite_master
> where...)
> > > did
For anyone who has the same questions I had, I've found most of the
answers.
PS. Excellent internal documentation of the VDBE (though a bit out-of-
date)! It made it really easy to navigate the source.
On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
What is the defined behaviour of int
I overly simplified my example. I'm actually selecting columns from
table B and C which is why I had this in the where clause:
AND ( JoinAToB.B_id = B.id )
AND ( JoinAToB.A_id = A.id )
...
Converting those to explicit JOIN clauses fixed the problem.
Thanks for your help!
-Original Message
Slater, Chad wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble with the performance of one of my queries and my "sql
kung fu" is limited. Any help with this problem would be greatly
appreciated
Here's a stripped down version of the tables I'm dealing with:
CREATE TABLE A (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCRE
Ron Stevens wrote:
In general, does SQLite protect against the database being opened
while it's being created so other processes don't open it assuming
everything is in a good state?
Ron,
No, you have to do that in your application.
In pseudo code your create function could do this:
open
Hello,
I'm having trouble with the performance of one of my queries and my "sql
kung fu" is limited. Any help with this problem would be greatly
appreciated
Here's a stripped down version of the tables I'm dealing with:
CREATE TABLE A (
id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
name TEXT
)
The basis of our business has been writing compilers and run time
packages to integrate legacy and newer software. We discovered that
basic computer science provides the answers and looking beyond the
paradigm of the legacy language or system is essential if a complexity
chain reaction is to b
To bootstrap my db's I create a database template. Then make a physical copy of
that. Locking and access is done via flock. So the first process to gain the
lock wins and is respoonsible for making the copy, the other just waits until
the lock is released and then connects.
I make lots of da
I have two processes trying to access a database for the first time at
roughly the same time. I'm wondering if it's possible to atomically
create a database and bootstrap it with some tables from one process
so that the other process doesn't open the database either before
SQLite has finished writ
On Feb 12, 2007, at 7:32 PM, John Stanton wrote:
I suggest that you also look carefully at the manifest typing
implemented in Sqlite. If your language is strongly typed you will
have some design issues to address.
I am aware of this issue and already have a solution. It's part of
why I wa
I wasn't suggesting that you use sqlite3_exec. On the contrary I would
counsel you not to. I just suggested that you look to see how it
implements callbacks and that you implement a callback to handle each
row. Then the logic of your interface is elegant.
If you are creating a language inte
Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
val Iterator1a = SQL.execute Query1 ("parameter1" & 2)
val Iterator1b = SQL.execute Query1 ("foobar" & 3)
val Iterator2 = SQL.execute Query2 4
case Iterator1a () of
NONE => print "End of this table"
| SOME (x & y) => print ("Got a row: " ^ x ^ ", " ^ Int.toString
You are almost certainly encountering disk cacheing effects.
Makavy, Erez (Erez) wrote:
Problem summery:
---
Simple queries sometimes take ~400 ms
Analysis:
---
- A php script runs the same SQL query several times in different places
(in different transactions).
So
Problem summery:
---
Simple queries sometimes take ~400 ms
Analysis:
---
- A php script runs the same SQL query several times in different places
(in different transactions).
Some of the queries take around 400ms while the others (identical
queries) takes only 4-20ms.
On Feb 12, 2007, at 3:22 PM, John Stanton wrote:
Look at how Sqlite implements callbacks in sqlite3_exec to discover
a way to implement your language.
I had already looked at it. I will be using the prepare_v2/bind/step/
reset/.../finalize interface instead. The exec interface is too
simplifi
Here's a question on INTEGER PRIMARY KEY. I would like use IP
addresses (converted to an unsigned number to man them monotonically
increasing) for INTEGER PRIMARY KEY however I can't determine from
the online docs whether if I supply an unsigned integer in PHP 5:
$uip = sprintf("%u", ip2long($
Hey, sorry I'm a little late on this one (as usual).
On 2/3/07, David M X Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am new to this but are these issues those of trying to get it to do what sqlite
it > is not designed for. I quote the book
The Definitive Guide to SQLite - Chapter 1 --- Networking
" ..
Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:21 AM, John Stanton wrote:
Prepared queries are actually the query compiled into the
metalanguage, VDBE. You can have many statements in one transaction,
and each of those statements can be reusing a VDBE virtual machine
instance with a curr
"Jay Sprenkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Igor is correct - you cannot do that now. But I have sometimes
> > wondered if it would be nice to add an exec() function to SQLite
> > that would recursively invoke its argument as an
On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:21 AM, John Stanton wrote:
Prepared queries are actually the query compiled into the
metalanguage, VDBE. You can have many statements in one
transaction, and each of those statements can be reusing a VDBE
virtual machine instance with a current set of data bound to it.
On 2/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor is correct - you cannot do that now. But I have sometimes
wondered if it would be nice to add an exec() function to SQLite
that would recursively invoke its argument as an SQL script.
For example:
SELECT exec('DELETE FROM ' || q
Prepared queries are actually the query compiled into the metalanguage,
VDBE. You can have many statements in one transaction, and each of
those statements can be reusing a VDBE virtual machine instance with a
current set of data bound to it.
When you reset the compiled statement you make it
Thanks for your answers!
On Feb 12, 2007, at 1:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Suppose you have two prepared queries: q1 and q2. I currently believe
that it is an error to execute: step q1, step q2, step q1.
No. Queries can be interleaved this
>Derrell,
>Just to clarify, you don't need to use an exclusive transaction. That
will acquire a write lock and unnecessarily block
>all other readers as well. You only need to hold a read lock to prevent
any other process from acquiring a write lock.
>Dennis Cote
I asked a similar question la
"Igor Tandetnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Artem Yankovskiy
> wrote:
> > I know about DROP TABLE.
> > I have not knew when compatibility DROP TABLE and
> > SELECT...
> >
> > DROP TABLE (select name from sqlite_master where...)
> > did not work.
> > Can I build resembling query?
>
> No. You wil
25 matches
Mail list logo