maybe... otoh, much of the thing's perceived value comes from things like the
datagrid functionality. this is DevExpress, and somehow I doubt they have a
version for lazarus. still, might have a look...
From: John Elrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
> SQLite is completely threadsafe in 3.5.2. But that does not mean
> that running SQLite will magically fix threading bugs in Linux 2.4
> kernels or in GLIBC. The FAQ warns you to beware these problems.
Thanks for the
Joe Wilson wrote:
--- Cariotoglou Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wish I could "make it for Unix", but it uses a lot of windows-specific
things, plus it is done
in Delphi, and since
Kylix is practically dead, wlll...
I didn't realize it was written in Delphi.
Yes, that would be
D. Richard Hipp wrote:
For threads within the same process, fcntl is broken by design in POSIX.
(You can clearly tell which parts of Unix were invented by Thompson
and Richie
and which parts were added later by clueless committees. Posix advisory
locks belong in the latter category.) SQLite
On Nov 25, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Teufel wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am using sqlite 3.3 awhile now for some statistic updates in
multithreaded enviroment. Now I would like to move on to 3.5.2 use
it more for other tasks too.
Since the sqlite db is placed here on a fs, which has a broken
fcntl, I
On Nov 25, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Roger Binns wrote:
I was under the impression that SQLite 3.5.2 is completely threadsafe,
meaning you can make any relevant API call in any thread. Examples of
things I thought are safe are:
- - Using statements from the same connection in different threads
- -
Hi everyone,
I am using sqlite 3.3 awhile now for some statistic updates in
multithreaded enviroment. Now I would like to move on to 3.5.2 use it
more for other tasks too.
Since the sqlite db is placed here on a fs, which has a broken fcntl, I
disabled it by putting "#define fcntl (A,B,C) 0".
Am Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:11:50 +0100 schrieb Andreas Volz:
> Hello,
>
> I used this minimal example code to test my sqlite connection. This
> works without problems. But now I tried to move the 'db' variable into
> the private member section of my 'Cache' class to access it from
> various member
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:40:13 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The new look for the SQLite website is now in place,
>if you haven't already noticed:
>
>http://www.sqlite.org/
>
>Even though the new look is "in place" you should
>understand this as a work in progress, not a done
>deal. I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roger Binns wrote:
> I was under the impression that SQLite 3.5.2 is completely threadsafe,
> meaning you can make any relevant API call in any thread.
I should be clearer what I meant by threadsafe. The most important
notion is that there is no
Imagine that a SQLite3 database opened in a custom application with a
registered a collation sequence named "unknown" has created the following table:
CREATE TABLE a (b COLLATE unknown);
Now open this table in the default SQLite3 CLI. Up to here, everything works as
expected.
Now some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was under the impression that SQLite 3.5.2 is completely threadsafe,
meaning you can make any relevant API call in any thread. Examples of
things I thought are safe are:
- - Using statements from the same connection in different threads
- -
--- Cariotoglou Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wish I could "make it for Unix", but it uses a lot of windows-specific
> things, plus it is done
> in Delphi, and since
> Kylix is practically dead, wlll...
I didn't realize it was written in Delphi.
Yes, that would be a difficult port to
On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 13:56 +0200, Cariotoglou Mike wrote:
> no, a mistake. the address IS :
> mikecar at singular dot gr (mike will also work)
> thanks for pointing out the header problem. I was hoping the mailing
> list was "hiding" this info, obviously not
Publicly accessible and searchable
Another question about this option. Is there any way I can tell how
much memory SQLite might need? I've set it to 10 megs, 20 and 40 megs
and I still get SQLITE_NOMEM errors from time to time.
C
-
To unsubscribe, send
and therein lies the tale of computer programmers and users... Scott,
and others... I *am* good at a few things, but compiling programs is
not one of them. I am basically a copy artist -- I can follow
instructions, but the instructions have to be good and explicit. And
then, I can create new good
no, a mistake. the address IS :
mikecar at singular dot gr (mike will also work)
thanks for pointing out the header problem. I was hoping the mailing list was
"hiding" this info, obviously not
An unencrypted address was plainly visible in the message headers
("From" and "X-Return-Path").
ooops mail obfuscation was wrong! it is actually :
mike atsign singular dot gr (I used ampersand in the original post which was
wrong. well, english is not my native lang...)
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL
Hello,
I used this minimal example code to test my sqlite connection. This
works without problems. But now I tried to move the 'db' variable into
the private member section of my 'Cache' class to access it from
various member functions. That's all. I would assume that this makes no
difference.
19 matches
Mail list logo
