-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/27/2010 02:20 PM, Art Age Software wrote:
> I guess the next question is how do I force the affinity to "blob"
The affinity is the type that SQLite will make a reasonable attemp to
convert to for that column, but leave the value as is if the
Thanks Roger. That does seem to be the problem as the type of the
columns is coming back as "text."
I guess the next question is how do I force the affinity to "blob"
using the PHP PDO API...
Sam
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Roger Binns wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/27/2010 11:48 AM, Art Age Software wrote:
> New to this list and hoping someone can help. I have a sqlite3
> database that contains a couple of tables that have binary data in
> BLOB columns.
Note that there is column affinity, but the data
Hi All,
New to this list and hoping someone can help. I have a sqlite3
database that contains a couple of tables that have binary data in
BLOB columns. I know the data is in there and stored correctly because
the application accessing the database can retrieve the column data
just fine.
The
Hi to everyone.This is my first post to the sqlite-users postlist so i am
sorry if i don't respect some rule.
My question is about the sqlite3_exec() function.I have the following code :
typedef struct _object object;
int main()
{
/* ... */
my_object*object;
object
"Max Vlasov" wrote...
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:09 AM, jose isaias cabrera
> wrote:
>
>>
>> What I would like to do is a call that can fix the dates to the correct
>> format, ie. -MM-DD, so that the final data looks like this,
>>
>>
> How about
>
> UPDATE Table1 Set
"BareFeetWare" wrote...
> On 27/10/2010, at 3:09 PM, jose isaias cabrera wrote:
>
>> I know I can do a bunch of sets, such as this one,
>>
>> UPDATE table1 set d1 = '2010-01-01'
>> where
>> d1 = '2010-1-1';
>>
>> but that is a lot of coding.
>
>
> Perhaps something like:
>
> create table
Jean-Marie CUAZ wrote:
> When using a SELECT query with WHERE and GROUP BY clauses, does it make
> sense to add the GROUP BY terms in an index allready containing the
> columns used in the WHERE clause ?
In some cases, it might help. If you have something like
select * from t
Hello,
When using a SELECT query with WHERE and GROUP BY clauses, does it make
sense to add the GROUP BY terms in an index allready containing the
columns used in the WHERE clause ?
If yes, should the columns used in the GROUP BY clause be at the
beginning of the columns order of the index ?
9 matches
Mail list logo