Hello,
I don't want to be annoying but why nowadays people are
sub-abusing-sub-selecting instead of using JOINs? moreover, that is in most
cases faster (a lot) and certainly more Human Readable.
Best Regards
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
>
Previous send munged. If it managed to make it properly, my apologies for
posting the same message twice.
Using the following schema:
CREATE TABLE TKRawData
(
EmpNo text collate nocase not null,
CustNo integer not null,
JobNo integer not null,
RawYear integer not null,
RawMonth integer
Using the following schema:
CREATE TABLE TKRawData
(
EmpNo text collate nocase not null,
CustNo integer not null,
JobNo integer not null,
RawYear integer not null,
RawMonth integer not null,
RawDays real not null,
primary key (EmpNo, JobNo, CustNo, RawYear, RawMonth)
);
CREATE TABLE
Hi,
Earlier today I tried to show how to use a profiler to somebody while
running a checkout on a very recent Subversion build on Windows. This build
contained Sqlite 3.8.3.1.
We happened to see that one of the functions that caught about 15% of the
profile samples was the function
Thanks everyone who helped me.
This is what I ended up with:
SELECT
key
, COALESCE(SUM(CASE WHEN STATUS!='C' THEN 1 END)
,SUM(CASE WHEN STATUS='C' THEN 1 END)) CNT
, COALESCE(MIN(CASE WHEN STATUS!='C' THEN STATUS END) || CASE WHEN
COUNT(DISTINCT CASE WHEN STATUS!='C' THEN
On 02/24/2014 05:54 AM, skywind mailing lists wrote:
In
afpUnlock(sqlite3_file *, int)
the sharedLockByte is defined as an int (int sharedLockByte =
SHARED_FIRST+pInode->sharedByte;) although all other related variables and the
following function parameters are defined as unsigned long
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:54:39 +0100
Richard Schülein wrote:
> So that means, if there is only 1 machine accessing the network database,
> there should be no problem with the network access and the locking?
I ended using only one sqlite full accessing the db. All others submit
So that means, if there is only 1 machine accessing the network database,
there should be no problem with the network access and the locking?
Best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Richard Schülein
Novel-Tech GmbH
Am Krautgarten 4
D-91717 Wassertrüdingen
Germany
fon: +49 (0) 9832 / 706 814
fax:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
> So single-user single-process use of a database, without hardware faults
> or power faults, should not present a problem.
>
Minor addenda/caveat: i have seen NFS-based systems which slow down (by
100x or more) apps
On 24 Feb 2014, at 12:07pm, Richard Schülein wrote:
> Is there anything needed to store the Database itself on a shared network
> devices? In my opinion this is similar to an USB drive etc. That means, that
> the drive don’t even know, where the database is stored. Or is
As a quick search will reveal, many network file systems have broken locking.
This can and will lead to database corruption as soon as more than one process
attempts to write to the database because SQLite relies on file locking to
implement transactions.
SQLite will happily open whatever path
Hi,
i have an general question regarding SQLite and Network.
As I can read here http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=SqliteNetwork
there can be problems with that
.
Do anybody have experience on that.
We use SQLLite on an embedded Linuxsystem on an Audioserver which store his
files on local
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:43:40 +0200, Alek Paunov wrote:
Just in case if Alessandro Furieri do not follow the list closely
Hi Alek,
I can simply add few more details to your already excellent
introduction.
SpatiaLite is a loadable extension adding standard Spatial SQL
capabilities to the
13 matches
Mail list logo