The fifth parameter is a pointer into which the address of the error message is
written. If you pass NULL (0), then no error message is returned, and no
memory is allocated to contain the message.
On the gripping hand, if you pass a pointer (non NULL / non 0) then memory is
allocated to conta
On 19 Nov 2016, at 10:22pm, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Ran Memtest86+ 5.01, two complete passes, with no errors.
Well, thanks for doing it anyway. It removes one possible source of problems.
Simon.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglist
Hi, ALL,
On the page https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/exec.html following phrase is written:
[quote]
If the 5th parameter to sqlite3_exec() is not NULL then any error
message is written into memory obtained from sqlite3_malloc() and
passed back through the 5th parameter.
[/quote]
Shouldn't it start w
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:18 AM, James K. Lowden
wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:55:11 -0800
> "Kevin O'Gorman" wrote:
>
> > All of the python code is a single thread. The closest I come
> > is a few times where I use subprocess.Popen to create what amounts to
> > a pipeline, and one place whe
Ran Memtest86+ 5.01, two complete passes, with no errors.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Kevin O'Gorman
wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Simon Slavin
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19 Nov 2016, at 4:08pm, Kevin O'Gorman
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have two different machines running this stuff.
Hi, ALL,
On the page https://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/exec.html following phrase is written:
[quote]
If the 5th parameter to sqlite3_exec() is not NULL then any error
message is written into memory obtained from sqlite3_malloc() and
passed back through the 5th parameter.
[/quote]
Shouldn't it start w
On 18/11/16 15:19, James K. Lowden wrote:
> Good catch, Roger. It's a liability, but I slightly disagree with your
> characterization.
>
>> - Running any Python code (destructors can be called which then run in
>> the parent and child)
>
> Yes, if those destructors affect shared resources. Th
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> On 19 Nov 2016, at 4:08pm, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
> > I have two different machines running this stuff. Only one is having the
> > seg faults, but they are different enough that this does not convince me
> > to blame hardware.
>
> Could
On 19 Nov 2016, at 4:08pm, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I have two different machines running this stuff. Only one is having the
> seg faults, but they are different enough that this does not convince me
> to blame hardware.
Could you, anyway, run a memory test on the computer which is failing ? I
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:19 PM, James K. Lowden
wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:56:37 -0800
> Roger Binns wrote:
>
> > Popen calls fork (it seems like you are doing Unix/Mac, not Windows).
> > fork() duplicates the process including all open file descriptors.
> > One or more of those descriptor
> -Original Message-
> From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On
> Behalf Of Jim Henderson
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 12:16 AM
> To: SQLite mailing list
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Anybody know why mono SQLite uses SqliteConnection
> but Windows uses
11 matches
Mail list logo
