ncurrent access from different threads
with the pattern your application needs. But SQLite is not your fellow
here - it doesn't offer this kind of memory structure.
Pavel
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Sharma,
Gaurav<gaurav.sha...@safenet-inc.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there any w
Hi All,
There is one doubt in my mind regarding the use of transactions with in memory
db. As it is documented on sqlite.org that transactions uses different type of
file locking. But in case of in memory db there is no physical file. So my
question is
1- Is there any significance of using
Hi All,
Can anybody look in to my query below and suggest me something helpful!
With Best Regards
Gaurav Sharma
-Original Message-
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org]
On Behalf Of Sharma, Gaurav
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 11:57 AM
To: sqlite
Hi All,
I assume, it's the right place to send this mail regarding some issues that I
have notice while using sqlite latest version 3.6.16.
I have recently moved from sqlite version 3.6.1 to 3.6.16 and while executing
the command "attach database ':memory:' as db2" I experience the crash in my
Hi All,
I assume, it's the right place to send this mail regarding some issues that I
have notice while using sqlite latest version 3.6.16.
I have recently moved from sqlite version 3.6.1 to 3.6.16 and while executing
the command "attach database ':memory:' as db2" I experience the crash in my
5 matches
Mail list logo