:
¹ http://www.sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki
--
Steven E. Harris
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
to tell whether this decoding
is ever necessary, though.
--
Steven E. Harris
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
which uses a
base-100 binary-coded "centimal digit" representation, as described on
the aforementioned Wiki page. Have you read it?
--
Steven E. Harris
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman
.0101 * 1 = 101
Are these examples wrong on the Wiki page, or am I misunderstanding the
encoding approach?
Footnotes:
¹ http://www.sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/key_encoding.wiki
--
Steven E. Harris
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
ht
use it as "X" in the "2*X+0" formula, shouldn't we
wind up with 198, or 0xC6? Likewise, for the second two examples, I'd
expect 2*99+1 to yield 199, or 0xC7. (The later entry for has bytes
0xC7 and 0xC6, which match my expectation.)
--
Steven E. Harris
__
ared with one call to memcmp() for each
pair of values, or does "value by value" mean simply that the
concatenated values' bytes will be compared from left to right, with one
call to memcmp() for the entire key?
--
Steven E. Harris
___
sqlite-user
en the/
Thank you for documenting all of this. It's ugly for a good reason,
which makes it beautiful at the same time.
--
Steven E. Harris
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
en the/
Thank you for documenting all of this. It's ugly for a good reason,
which makes it beautiful at the same time.
--
Steven E. Harris
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
en the/
Thank you for documenting all of this. It's ugly for a good reason,
which makes it beautiful at the same time.
--
Steven E. Harris
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
focused solely on writing in batches, which
multiple threads looking to write to different tables concurrently, your
response thus far says that shared-cache mode isn't going to help with
that contention.
Footnotes:
¹
http://code.google.com/p/sqlite-jdbc/source/browse/src/main
he.html
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general/52767
[3] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general/52784
[4] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.sqlite.general/51381/focus=51885
[5] http://www.xerial.org/trac/Xerial/wiki/SQLiteJDBC
--
Steven E. Harris
Xavier RAYNAUD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use native JNI libraries, and choose at runtime the native library
> to open. (on eclipse, with OS-dependant fragments, it's easy to do)
Can you elaborate on how you make this selection, and how you package
the fragment?
--
Stev
, or on lines beginning
with the comment "-- go" or something more deliberate. Or, going even
further, putting each statement in a separate XML element, and letting
an XML parser do the splitting.
I'll be working on this problem this morning, so any more advice would
be most welcome.
Fo
3_exec() interface executes every statement in the string
> you hand it.
Unfortunately this library has yet to wrap this function.
Ouch.
Footnotes:
¹ http://www.sqlite.org/capi3ref.html#sqlite3_prepare
--
Steven E. Harris
---
s:
¹ http://www.zentus.com/sqlitejdbc/
--
Steven E. Harris
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Dennis Cote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>if the user version is not zero
ITYM "is zero".
--
Steven E. Harris
-
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
16 matches
Mail list logo