On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:49:05 +0900
?? wrote:
> > On 13 Jun 2016, at 10:13pm, Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> > The rename-is-atomic assumption is so wide-spread in the Linux
> > world, that the linux kernel was modified to make renames closer to
> > being
> On 13 Jun 2016, at 10:13pm, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> The rename-is-atomic assumption is so
> wide-spread in the Linux world, that the linux kernel was modified to
> make renames closer to being atomic on common filesystems such as
> EXT4.
On 13 Jun 2016, at 10:13pm, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 6/13/16, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
>> The relevance to this list is mostly in the last item above: atomic
>> safe-save primitives.
>
> The documentation indicates that safe-save only does file rename
>
On 6/13/16, Simon Slavin wrote:
>
> The relevance to this list is mostly in the last item above: atomic
> safe-save primitives.
The documentation indicates that safe-save only does file rename
operations atomically. This of no help in making SQLite transactions
atomic.
Please excuse my arguably off-topic posting, but Apple users should greet this
with merriment. One of the lower-profile things announced at Apple's current
WWDC conference is a replacement for HFS+ (introduced in 1998), tuned to the
demands of the modern age:
5 matches
Mail list logo