Re: [sqlite] Apple announces new File System with better ACID support

2016-06-14 Thread James K. Lowden
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:49:05 +0900 ?? wrote: > > On 13 Jun 2016, at 10:13pm, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > > The rename-is-atomic assumption is so wide-spread in the Linux > > world, that the linux kernel was modified to make renames closer to > > being

Re: [sqlite] Apple announces new File System with better ACID support

2016-06-13 Thread ネイト・フィンドリー
> On 13 Jun 2016, at 10:13pm, Richard Hipp wrote: > > The rename-is-atomic assumption is so > wide-spread in the Linux world, that the linux kernel was modified to > make renames closer to being atomic on common filesystems such as > EXT4.

Re: [sqlite] Apple announces new File System with better ACID support

2016-06-13 Thread Simon Slavin
On 13 Jun 2016, at 10:13pm, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/13/16, Simon Slavin wrote: > >> The relevance to this list is mostly in the last item above: atomic >> safe-save primitives. > > The documentation indicates that safe-save only does file rename >

Re: [sqlite] Apple announces new File System with better ACID support

2016-06-13 Thread Richard Hipp
On 6/13/16, Simon Slavin wrote: > > The relevance to this list is mostly in the last item above: atomic > safe-save primitives. The documentation indicates that safe-save only does file rename operations atomically. This of no help in making SQLite transactions atomic.

[sqlite] Apple announces new File System with better ACID support

2016-06-13 Thread Simon Slavin
Please excuse my arguably off-topic posting, but Apple users should greet this with merriment. One of the lower-profile things announced at Apple's current WWDC conference is a replacement for HFS+ (introduced in 1998), tuned to the demands of the modern age: