Re: [sqlite] Bug and possible fix: Access violation in rtree.c:nodeGetRowid()

On Jun 2, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Simon Slavin wrote: > > On 2 Jun 2010, at 10:12am, Dan Kennedy wrote: > >> The fix you propose would ignore the (suspected) corruption >> and continue without reporting it to the user. Which might be >> the best thing for some > > but not for me. Please do not roll

Re: [sqlite] Bug and possible fix: Access violation in rtree.c:nodeGetRowid()

On 2 Jun 2010, at 10:12am, Dan Kennedy wrote: > The fix you propose would ignore the (suspected) corruption > and continue without reporting it to the user. Which might be > the best thing for some but not for me. Please do not roll anything like that into the source. I definitely want error

Re: [sqlite] Bug and possible fix: Access violation in rtree.c:nodeGetRowid()

On Jun 1, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Peter Kolbus wrote: > I am getting an access violation in rtree.c::nodeGetRowid() using a > database image of questionable integrity (the application the database > was last updated on shut down abnormally, but executing PRAGMA > integrity_check returns "ok" and

[sqlite] Bug and possible fix: Access violation in rtree.c:nodeGetRowid()

I am getting an access violation in rtree.c::nodeGetRowid() using a database image of questionable integrity (the application the database was last updated on shut down abnormally, but executing PRAGMA integrity_check returns "ok" and there is no journal file). The access violation can be