Here(http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=ScrollingCursor) said "Do not try to
implement a scrolling window using LIMIT and OFFSET. Doing so will become
sluggish as the user scrolls down toward the bottom of the list.?. But the page
also said "This information is obsolete?
https://www.sqlite.org
?? wrote:
> Here(http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/wiki?p=ScrollingCursor) said "Do
> not try to implement a scrolling window using LIMIT and OFFSET. Doing
> so will become sluggish as the user scrolls down toward the bottom of
> the list.?. But the page also said "This information is obsolete?
"Obsol
On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 14:12:04 +0100
Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > https://www.sqlite.org/lang_select.html talks about LIMIT & OFFSET,
> > without mentioning that is a bad idea.
>
> Neither does it mention that it is a good idea.
>
> > can I do that or not (will it become sluggish if I do that) ?
>
On 2016-03-02 5:02 AM, ?? wrote:
> Here... said "Do not try to implement a scrolling window using LIMIT and
> OFFSET. Doing so will become sluggish as the user scrolls down toward the
> bottom of the list.?. But the page also said "This information is obsolete?
> ... talks about LIMIT & OFFSET, w
Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> > https://www.sqlite.org/lang_select.html talks about LIMIT & OFFSET,
> > without mentioning that is a bad idea.
>> Neither does it mention that it is a good idea.
>> > can I do that or not (will it become sluggish if I do that) ?
>> When you use large OFFSET values, the
>A better way that is very similar is to use WHERE and LIMIT instead.I know
>that but as I just replied to this thread, if I do that I will then have to
>record each columns I use for each table I want scroll cursor. So from the
>implementation point of view, using LIMIT & OFFSET is easier.
Qiu
On 2016-03-02 6:48 PM, ?? wrote:
>> A better way that is very similar is to use WHERE and LIMIT instead.
>
> I know that but as I just replied to this thread, if I do that I will then
> have to record each columns I use for each table I want scroll cursor. So
> from the implementation point of v
So according to your answers and others, this limitation is always there even
the document said "obsolete" ? Just want to double confirm.
Thanks!
Qiulang
At 2016-03-03 11:06:08, "Darren Duncan" wrote:
>On 2016-03-02 6:48 PM, ?? wrote:
>>> A better way that is very similar is to use WHERE an
Using OFFSET means you have to sort and count all the records you're skipping
before getting to the ones you want, and using WHERE means you can avoid
counting and only sort the ones you're not skipping. That is how it is,
regardless of what that document you saw says. -- Darren Duncan
On 2016
On 2016/03/03 5:10 AM, ?? wrote:
> So according to your answers and others, this limitation is always there even
> the document said "obsolete" ? Just want to double confirm.
>
>
> Thanks!
To add to what Clemens already mentioned - this problem is not an SQLite
problem, this problem is true an
On 2016-03-02 11:18 PM, R Smith wrote:
> On 2016/03/03 5:10 AM, ?? wrote:
>> So according to your answers and others, this limitation is always there even
>> the document said "obsolete" ? Just want to double confirm.
>
> To add to what Clemens already mentioned - this problem is not an SQLite
> pr
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:43:26 +0800 (CST)
?? wrote:
> > Can anyone describe a situation for which this style of LIMIT &
> > OFFSET is advisable from the application's point of view? (The
> > DBMS costs are obvious enough.)
>
> For me this is the easiest way to implement a scrolling cursor.
> Ot
On 2016-03-03 11:27 AM, James K. Lowden wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 10:43:26 +0800 (CST)
> ?? wrote:
>
>>> Can anyone describe a situation for which this style of LIMIT &
>>> OFFSET is advisable from the application's point of view? (The
>>> DBMS costs are obvious enough.)
>>
>> For me this is th
On 2016/03/04 10:35 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> On 2016-03-03 11:27 AM, James K. Lowden wrote:
>>
>> You say, "record ... the condition ... to scroll [the table]". I'm
>> sure I don't know what "condition" you mean.
>>
>> You appear to be doing something like:
>>
>> offset = 0
>> do
>>
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:35:47 -0800
Darren Duncan wrote:
> > How exactly is the first way "easiest"?
>
> If these are pages displayed to the user, they may want to scroll
> backwards at some point;
They might, and if you say it's easier to go back to the database than
to keep track of previousl
On Saturday, 5 March, 2016 14:03, James K. Lowden
said:
> To: sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Can I implement a scrolling window using LIMIT and
> OFFSET ?
> On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:35:47 -0800
> Darren Duncan wrote:
> > > How exactly i
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 17:16:52 -0700
"Keith Medcalf" wrote:
> > Sometimes it's faster to recompute something than to cache it for
> > later re-use. That's rare where I/O is involved, and vanishing rare
> > where SQL is involved.
>
> The only thing worse is retrieving the entire result set and cach
17 matches
Mail list logo
