Re: [sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-16 Thread Robert L Cochran
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote: On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:48:44PM -0500, Robert L Cochran wrote: I did a poor job of explaining this issue. GCC builds of 3.5.4 seem to fail. I've sent Richard a bunch of log files comparing source code builds of versions 3.5.3 and 3.5.4 showing what I believe

Re: [sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-16 Thread Zbigniew Baniewski
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 12:48:44PM -0500, Robert L Cochran wrote: > I did a poor job of explaining this issue. GCC builds of 3.5.4 seem to > fail. I've sent Richard a bunch of log files comparing source code > builds of versions 3.5.3 and 3.5.4 showing what I believe are symptoms > of the

Re: [sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-15 Thread Christian Werner
Following patch applied to the CVS version compiled w/o warnings on a CentOS 5 x86_64 box. But I didn't run the test yet ... and autoconf logic regarding availability of ptrdiff_t is missing, too. Index: src/func.c === RCS file:

Re: [sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-15 Thread Robert L Cochran
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert L Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While compiling version 3.5.4 using gcc, I got these messages from 'make' on my CentOS 5 host. It looks to me like the 'make' step failed. I can post the config.log if that would help. How can I fix this to get a

Re: [sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-15 Thread Christian Werner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Christian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What about using the ptrdiff_t type in those places instead. > > > > Is ptrdiff_t implemented on all C compiler environments that > SQLite builds on? I'm afraid not, thus some autoconf logic might be required to

Re: [sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-15 Thread drh
Christian Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > ... > > The warnings all have to do with the fact that you are > > compiling on a machine with 64-bit pointers and 32-bit > > integers. The warnings are all harmless and the code > > works as intended as long as > > >

Re: [sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-15 Thread Christian Werner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ... > The warnings all have to do with the fact that you are > compiling on a machine with 64-bit pointers and 32-bit > integers. The warnings are all harmless and the code > works as intended as long as > > sizeof(int) <= sizeof(void*) > > Perhaps a reader can

Re: [sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-15 Thread drh
Robert L Cochran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While compiling version 3.5.4 using gcc, I got these messages from > 'make' on my CentOS 5 host. It looks to me like the 'make' step failed. > I can post the config.log if that would help. > > How can I fix this to get a successful compile? > I

[sqlite] Compiling Problem With SQLite 3.5.4

2007-12-15 Thread Robert L Cochran
While compiling version 3.5.4 using gcc, I got these messages from 'make' on my CentOS 5 host. It looks to me like the 'make' step failed. I can post the config.log if that would help. How can I fix this to get a successful compile? Bob Cochran ./libtool --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -I.