Steve O'Hara wrote:
I have used SQLite in a whole bundle of applications and I love it.
However, I've got an app that's being written in Java - I've got a JNI
library (Solaris & Windows) for SQLite, but I really want something
platform independent.
I've been worn down by my quest for a compara
>>Java libraries linked with C (via JNI) generally have to run with the exact
>>same version of Java they were built with.
>
> Uh-oh, Sun advertises something else.
Hmm... I may have been confused in the matter by having had (unrelated)
problems. I would go with what Sun advertises.
Randy
--
[E
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 10:05:31AM -0500, John Stanton wrote:
> I've been worn down by my quest for a comparable product to SQLite
> written in pure Java and have come to the conclusion that it doesn't
> exit. I've looked at Derby, QED, Axion, blah blah and I'm not too
> impressed by any of them.
Fred injects a big dose of common sense, and a principle which goes back
almost a thousand years - Occam's Razor also known as K.I.S.S.
How often do we see people laboring over a high level "simple" solution
to a low level problem and in exasperation jump in and solve it in a
very short time w
On 10/25/05, Clay Dowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No matter if JVM versions do or don't have to be matched, using a native
> DLL is clearly not a good solution for the original poster. It does
> completely defeat the compile once run anywhere goal of Java. Presumably
> if he was willing to a
I've been worn down by my quest for a comparable product to SQLite
written in pure Java and have come to the conclusion that it doesn't
exit. I've looked at Derby, QED, Axion, blah blah and I'm not too
impressed by any of them.
None of them are as good as SQLite and they all use multiple files fo
Florian Weimer said:
> Uh-oh, Sun advertises something else.
>
> I can understand that you must exactly match JVM versions for
> certified configurations, but this isn't true even if you don't use
> native code.
>
No matter if JVM versions do or don't have to be matched, using a native
DLL is cle
* Randy Ray:
> Java libraries linked with C (via JNI) generally have to run with the exact
> same version of Java they were built with.
Uh-oh, Sun advertises something else.
I can understand that you must exactly match JVM versions for
certified configurations, but this isn't true even if you do
Steve O'Hara wrote:
The attraction of a pure Java solution is obvious - if a client wants
this app to run on VMS then I've got to create another JNI library that
is VMS specific. Id you've ever written any JNI you'll know why this
isn't an all together pleasurable experience.
Also - a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hsql is pretty smart in java, the storage is editable by texpad it is only
consisted of sql statements. It s an in memory only DB
It can store and use on disk db as well.
I was evaluating it for an embedded DB, seemed prety easy to use. I
haven't used it in an
g bigger and faster
hardware.
Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve O'Hara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 3:59 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: [sqlite] Convert SQLite to Java
>
>
> I have used SQLite in a whole bundle of app
reasonbale job but with a whole load of missing stuff, mainly in pager.c
I'll have another crack at it when I get a bit more time.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rg] On Behalf Of Andrew Piskorski
Sent: 24 October 2005 22:21
To: sqlite-users@sq
> Uh, why isn't your first choice simply, "Use SQLite from Java"?
> Surely calling C libraries is something the Java folks have worked out
> how to do many years ago? Or what am I missing here? What is the
> attraction of "pure Java"?
Java libraries linked with C (via JNI) generally have to run
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 09:58:53PM +0100, Steve O'Hara wrote:
> I've been worn down by my quest for a comparable product to SQLite
> written in pure Java and have come to the conclusion that it doesn't
> exit. I've looked at Derby, QED, Axion, blah blah and I'm not too
> My next port of call is
On 10/24/05, Steve O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been worn down by my quest for a comparable product to SQLite
> written in pure Java and have come to the conclusion that it doesn't
> exit. I've looked at Derby, QED, Axion, blah blah and I'm not too
> impressed by any of them.
> None of
"Steve O'Hara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/24/2005 10:58 PM
Please respond to sqlite-users
To:
cc:
Subject: [sqlite] Convert SQLite to Java
I have used SQLite in a whole bundle of applications and I love it.
However, I've got an app th
I have used SQLite in a whole bundle of applications and I love it.
However, I've got an app that's being written in Java - I've got a JNI
library (Solaris & Windows) for SQLite, but I really want something
platform independent.
I've been worn down by my quest for a comparable product to SQLite
w
17 matches
Mail list logo