On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Nick Eubank wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't clear: I have 64 bit R and Windows, but since there are no
> 64 bit binaries for SQLite I started with 32 bit SQLite.
>
> So now I'm wondering if I could fix this memory problem by installing the
> 64-bit version of SQLite.
>
A 64-bit Windows DLL is now available at http://www.sqlite.org/download.html
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Nick Eubank
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I wasn't clear: I have 64 bit R and Windows, but since there are no
>> 64 bit binaries f
Richard, you are my hero. :)
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> A 64-bit Windows DLL is now available at
> http://www.sqlite.org/download.html
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Nick Eubank
> > wr
Simon Slavin wrote on Monday, June 30, 2014 12:21 PM
>
> SQLite isn't a thing, it's an API. There's no SQLite server. There's
> no particular installation of SQLite on a computer that Windows expects
> to be in a particular place. You can have many copies of many
> different versions of SQLite
On 30 Jun 2014, at 5:14pm, Nick Eubank wrote:
> So now I'm wondering if I could fix this memory problem by installing the
> 64-bit version of SQLite.
SQLite isn't a thing, it's an API. There's no SQLite server. There's no
particular installation of SQLite on a computer that Windows expects t
Sorry, I wasn't clear: I have 64 bit R and Windows, but since there are no
64 bit binaries for SQLite I started with 32 bit SQLite.
So now I'm wondering if I could fix this memory problem by installing the
64-bit version of SQLite.
(I know that this wouldn't fix the problem in postgres, for examp
On 30 Jun 2014, at 4:58pm, Nick Eubank wrote:
> Thanks Cory -- is this fixed in 64 bit versions of SQLite? I know postgres
> never changed memory address variable storage in the 64 bit so the problem
> persists.
You are misunderstanding the problem. There is no bug to be fixed. It is in
the
Thanks Cory -- is this fixed in 64 bit versions of SQLite? I know postgres
never changed memory address variable storage in the 64 bit so the problem
persists.
Also: any advice on getting a 64bit installation for someone who doesn't
really know how to compile C?
Thanks!
Nick
On Monday, June 30,
Without special handling, any 32-bit Windows process is limited to a 2GB
user address space. Due to fragmentation during allocation, you'll never
reach a full 2GB.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Nick Eubank wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm a social scientist wrestling with SQLite in Windows 8 (throu
Hi All,
I'm a social scientist wrestling with SQLite in Windows 8 (through R using
the RSQLite library) for some data manipulation and querying.
No matter what I do to cache_size (or R's memory settings), SQLite never
seems to be using more than about ~1900 mb of RAM. Is that a result of the
32 b
10 matches
Mail list logo