Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

2004-09-03 Thread Jakub Adamek
Nuno, hurrah, it works on first tests. I will run more later. Clever idea! I am now looking much forward to the release ... Thanks for your work. Jakub Nuno Lucas wrote: Jakub Adamek, dando pulos de alegria, escreveu : > Nuno, I am much surprised that version 3.0.5 helped you. It didn't help >

Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

2004-09-03 Thread Nuno Lucas
Jakub Adamek, dando pulos de alegria, escreveu : > Nuno, I am much surprised that version 3.0.5 helped you. It didn't help > me. Neither my nor your port. BUT your remark helped me! You are right > that it is because of stack space, and the default setting in Windows CE > projects is 0x1, i.e.

Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

2004-09-03 Thread Jakub Adamek
Nuno, I am much surprised that version 3.0.5 helped you. It didn't help me. Neither my nor your port. BUT your remark helped me! You are right that it is because of stack space, and the default setting in Windows CE projects is 0x1, i.e. 65 kB. After changing to 0x10, i.e. 1 MB my test

Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

2004-09-01 Thread Nuno Lucas
Jakub, I must ask you to forgive me as only now noticed you were not the sender of the tracker message for the bug. Sorry for the confusion (I must stop replying messages late at night). In the code I tested it was always the 113th row because I only created a single table. I would assume it

Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

2004-09-01 Thread Jakub Adamek
Nuno, I have changed back to SQLite 2 and have my code ready to switch to version 3 again if the bug is repaired. The thing happens when first calling balance_nonroot, which is in your case always on the 113th row, in my case on the 33th row and in the mail message

Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

2004-08-31 Thread Nuno Lucas
Jakub, the "official" sqlite version isn't broken, it's the WinCE port that is. I decided to announce that in the SQLite-WinCE page so people wouldn't expect it to just work. There are other issues with the WinCE port (like the Unicode handling, and that is also in the official version), but this

Re: [sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

2004-08-31 Thread Jakub Adamek
I didn't mention that I applied the diffs from SQLite-WinCE to version 3.0.5 with the same results. Jakub Jakub Adamek wrote: Hello, the version 3 is most probably broken. I traced down the crash problem in Windows CE, see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5438459_id=35230

[sqlite] Is version 3 seriously broken?

2004-08-31 Thread Jakub Adamek
Hello, the version 3 is most probably broken. I traced down the crash problem in Windows CE, see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=5438459_id=35230 It happens in balance_nonroot but in the declare variable section! If I change the variables in balance_nonroot to "static",