b.bum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> SQLite3 produces smaller data files
thats true,
> and is faster, in general, than did SQLite2.
but this is not my experience. In my small applications (about 20
records) inserting and searching with SQLite 3.0 is slower than SQLite 2.8
(about 25%). Ther
>-Original Message-
>From: Mauricio Piacentini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 1:42 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [sqlite] Lock files
>
>
>Fred Williams wrote:
>> I picked SQLite for its minuscule (by today's
>-Original Message-
>From: b.bum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 1:34 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [sqlite] Lock files
>
>
>On Sep 24, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Fred Williams wrote:
>> I picked SQLite for its minuscule (b
Fred Williams wrote:
I picked SQLite for its minuscule (by today's standards) footprint,
simplicity, and ease of deployment.
Why do I get the feeling I've bought into a product like any model in the
American car market. With each passing interation the vehicle gets bigger,
fatter, and less efficie
On Sep 24, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Fred Williams wrote:
I picked SQLite for its minuscule (by today's standards) footprint,
simplicity, and ease of deployment.
Why do I get the feeling I've bought into a product like any model in
the
American car market. With each passing interation the vehicle gets
: Friday, September 24, 2004 12:34 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Ara.T.Howard
>Subject: Re: [sqlite] Lock files
>
>
>On Sep 24, 2004, at 10:42 AM, Eddy Macnaghten wrote:
>> I am getting some tests together now. As soon as I have got it ready
>> enough I will put it on my
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Eddy Macnaghten wrote:
An attraction of SQLite is that it is all client based - making almost
practically zero cost administration. Although this is not an issue on
implementations that have an IT department, it makes a BIG difference in
supporting the penny-ally implementatio
On Sep 24, 2004, at 10:42 AM, Eddy Macnaghten wrote:
I am getting some tests together now. As soon as I have got it ready
enough I will put it on my site and inform the list...
As a part of your tests, it would be helpful to have some abuse tests
that involve multiple processes reading/writing ag
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 16:50, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Eddy Macnaghten wrote:
>
> > There is no way I can guarantee the "nfs" to be good. Also, a mixture of
> > Linux and Windows clients need to be allowed for, I do not know how SAMBA
> > supports the fcntl functionality, or how
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 24 Sep 2004, at 17:43, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 24 Sep 2004, at 14:51, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
What are people's views on this?
i think it's sufficiently common to merit discussion on best practices
at
least.
More tha
On 24 Sep 2004, at 17:43, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 24 Sep 2004, at 14:51, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
What are people's views on this?
i think it's sufficiently common to merit discussion on best
practices at
least.
More than that, I'm thinking there might be a call
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, David Fletcher wrote:
Hi all,
http://opendlm.sourceforge.net might be an interesting place to
start.
great link. thanks!
-a
--
===
| EMAIL :: Ara [dot] T [dot] Howard [at] noaa [dot] gov
| PHONE ::
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On 24 Sep 2004, at 14:51, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
What are people's views on this?
i think it's sufficiently common to merit discussion on best practices at
least.
More than that, I'm thinking there might be a call for an os_nfs.c that uses
this NFS clean lock
Hi all,
http://opendlm.sourceforge.net might be an interesting place to
start.
--
David Fletcher Tuscany Design Automation, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 5875 S. Danube Circle
303.690.4309Aurora, CO 80015-3169 USA
> "MS" ==
On 24 Sep 2004, at 14:51, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
What are people's views on this?
i think it's sufficiently common to merit discussion on best practices
at
least.
More than that, I'm thinking there might be a call for an os_nfs.c that
uses this NFS clean locking mechanism.
Matt.
___
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Eddy Macnaghten wrote:
There is no way I can guarantee the "nfs" to be good. Also, a mixture of
Linux and Windows clients need to be allowed for, I do not know how SAMBA
supports the fcntl functionality, or how well it interfaces with the Windows
Server or Client locking mecha
On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 14:51, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Eddy Macnaghten wrote:
>
> > However, reading the documentation it seems that SQLite is not hot on
> > concurrent access through networks, or across platforms, due to the funnies
> > of fcntl, or incompatibilities between Wind
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Eddy Macnaghten wrote:
However, reading the documentation it seems that SQLite is not hot on
concurrent access through networks, or across platforms, due to the funnies
of fcntl, or incompatibilities between Windows and Linux and so on.
it works o.k. if your nfs impl is good (n
Hi there
I am new to this list, so please excuse me if this has been covered
before, or is not the right place for this.
I am writing a development language/environment that has a SQL back
end. I am (planning to) put in a number of SQL engine connectivities,
and SQLite is ideal for the low end t
19 matches
Mail list logo
