On 3/26/07, Joe Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Alberto Simões <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The tables are related but they are already being created in parallel
> (three tables). I was joining them just because it was easier to move.
> But given the new, erm, big size, I think I'll
--- Alberto Simões <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The tables are related but they are already being created in parallel
> (three tables). I was joining them just because it was easier to move.
> But given the new, erm, big size, I think I'll maintain them split.
>
> Joe Wilson idea of attaching the
On 3/26/07, Eduardo Morras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 17:22 26/03/2007, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have a database with three tables (bigrams, trigrams and
>tetragrams). Basically, they are:
> TABLE( A, B, Count) IDX(A,B) IDX(B)
> TABLE( A, B, C, Count) IDX(A,B,C) IDX(B) IDX(C)
> TABLE( A,
At 17:22 26/03/2007, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have a database with three tables (bigrams, trigrams and
>tetragrams). Basically, they are:
> TABLE( A, B, Count) IDX(A,B) IDX(B)
> TABLE( A, B, C, Count) IDX(A,B,C) IDX(B) IDX(C)
> TABLE( A, B, C, D, Count) IDX (A,B,C,D) IDX(B) IDX(C) IDX(D)
>
--- Alberto Simões <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a database with three tables (bigrams, trigrams and
> tetragrams). Basically, they are:
>TABLE( A, B, Count) IDX(A,B) IDX(B)
>TABLE( A, B, C, Count) IDX(A,B,C) IDX(B) IDX(C)
>TABLE( A, B, C, D, Count) IDX (A,B,C,D) IDX(B)
Hi
I have a database with three tables (bigrams, trigrams and
tetragrams). Basically, they are:
TABLE( A, B, Count) IDX(A,B) IDX(B)
TABLE( A, B, C, Count) IDX(A,B,C) IDX(B) IDX(C)
TABLE( A, B, C, D, Count) IDX (A,B,C,D) IDX(B) IDX(C) IDX(D)
Now, this database is quickly getting
6 matches
Mail list logo