On 26 Jul 2016, at 8:02am, sanhua.zh wrote:
> Is SQLite 4 in a developing status?
You are correct. Please do not use SQLite 4 for serious work. At the moment
it is just a way for the developers to experiment with ideas for a future
version of SQLite. Everything
Hello,
I found this pagewhich is about SQLite 4. But there are no download page in it
and the most recently update is 2015.08.15. Is SQLite 4 in a developing status?
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
The problem is, it is not ported to Windows as all...
I made a quick (and dirty) port of lsm_unix, but other things (e.g. the
environment) are also missing.
Gabriel
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Gabriel Corneanu
wrote:
> I understand, but I wanted to make a performance comparison. I read some
> good news, but I need to test it for my case.
> Am in a situation where the bottleneck is the CPU (sqlite), not IO.
> Therefore I'm very
I understand, but I wanted to make a performance comparison. I read some
good news, but I need to test it for my case.
Am in a situation where the bottleneck is the CPU (sqlite), not IO.
Therefore I'm very interested in an early idea about performance.
Even if it's not ready, I could at least
On 02/19/2013 03:50 PM, Gabriel Corneanu wrote:
I am also on final steps of a new project, and I would love to compare
sqlite4 before release (the data files will be public, therefore a later
switch would be problematic).
Is there any chance to get it for windows? I usually need the dll.
Last
I am also on final steps of a new project, and I would love to compare
sqlite4 before release (the data files will be public, therefore a later
switch would be problematic).
Is there any chance to get it for windows? I usually need the dll.
Last time I could not compile it (mingw), there are
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:26:09 -0600
"Marc L. Allen" wrote:
> I'm sorry if this isn't the right group, but an earlier message mentioned it,
> and I found some stuff on the SQLite website.
>
My answer may be a bit off topic, but if you search the subdomains under
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Marc L. Allen wrote:
> Thanks. Any clue on whether we'll use an amalgamation as with SQLite4 or
> direct sources?
>
Amalgamation.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
sqlite-users
of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] SQLite 4
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Marc L. Allen <mlal...@outsitenetworks.com
> wrote:
> I'm sorry if this isn't the right group, but an earlier message
> mentioned it, and I found some stuff on the SQLite website.
>
> Althou
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Marc L. Allen wrote:
> I'm sorry if this isn't the right group, but an earlier message mentioned
> it, and I found some stuff on the SQLite website.
>
> Although I've had a long-standing project to incorporate SQLite into our
>
I'm sorry if this isn't the right group, but an earlier message mentioned it,
and I found some stuff on the SQLite website.
Although I've had a long-standing project to incorporate SQLite into our
product (and have done so), it has never been deployed. I like the looks of
SQLite 4, but have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julian Qian wrote:
> I would like us to understand the write patterns of Sqlite.
It looks like the 4 bytes is some sort of header for each database page.
Your trace seems to be of the Android emulator rather than your
application (there are no
I would like us to understand the write patterns of Sqlite. . That
write pattern happens first to the journal then to the database. I
found a lot of 4 byte writes.
What are these 4 byte writes and can the be avoided? I would also like
data on the write patterns for a 1k,2k,128k, and 256k writes
14 matches
Mail list logo