Re: [sqlite] SQLite website A/B comparison

Richard Hipp writes: > Which is the better "timeline" display for the SQLite project status, > in your opinion? > > A: https://sqlite.org/src/timeline > B: https://sqlite.org/b/timeline > I prefer A; having the "Older" link at the top doesn't seem right for some reason.

[sqlite] SQLite website A/B comparison

Which is the better "timeline" display for the SQLite project status, in your opinion? A: https://sqlite.org/src/timeline B: https://sqlite.org/b/timeline Since this question is really more about the version-control system than SQLite itself, please reply directly to me rather responding

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website documentation query

On 13 Sep 2012, at 10:39pm, Richard Hipp wrote: > Links to the version 3 documentation, on the other hand, are plastered all > over the homepage (http://www.sqlite.org), getting high-value placement > right there under "Common Links" on the right-hand side, and featured on >

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website documentation query

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Simon Slavin wrote: > I'm looking for an in-depth discussion of what each of the error codes > mean, like the one on the page > > http://www.sqlite.org/c_interface.html > > which appears from its position to be part of the current,

[sqlite] SQLite website documentation query

I'm looking for an in-depth discussion of what each of the error codes mean, like the one on the page http://www.sqlite.org/c_interface.html which appears from its position to be part of the current, up-to-date documentation for SQLite. However, that page has the title "The C language

[sqlite] sqlite website bug

Hy. I think i found a "bug" on the website. Please take a look. from the news page of the website: --- 2009-Sep-11 - Version 3.6.18 Beginning with this release, the SQLite source code is tracked and managed using the Fossil distributed

[sqlite] SQLite website outage & mailing list upgrade, 2008-02-02

We are going to be upgrading the server that runs the SQLite website this comming Saturday, if all goes according to plan. We are planning to changes the operating system from Debian to Ubuntu and the mailing list manager from ezmlm to GNU mailman. If everything goes as planned, the outage will

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website

On Nov 10, 2007 5:54 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When you click on one of the links on the menu bar, afterwards > the font color is almost identical to the background color > so you can no longer read the text. Can you suggest a fix > for this problem? I uploaded a new version with explicit

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: "James Darpinian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I decided to try turning the page into a pure CSS layout with no tables. The result is available at http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~jdarpini/sqlite.html I tested it in IE6; 3 hopefully unobtrusive hacks

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "James Darpinian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I decided to try turning the page into a pure CSS layout with no > > tables. The result is available at > > http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~jdarpini/sqlite.html I tested it in IE6; 3 > > hopefully unobtrusive hacks were needed

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website

"James Darpinian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I decided to try turning the page into a pure CSS layout with no > tables. The result is available at > http://www.cs.hmc.edu/~jdarpini/sqlite.html I tested it in IE6; 3 > hopefully unobtrusive hacks were needed for it to render decently. > When

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website

I like (2), but I do not like much the dropdown menus. Cheers On Nov 10, 2007 8:49 AM, James Darpinian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I put up 4 variations. Please, everyone, offer your opinions: > > > >(1) http://sqlite.hwaci.com/v1/ No CSS of any kind. > >(2)

[sqlite] SQLite website

> I put up 4 variations. Please, everyone, offer your opinions: > >(1) http://sqlite.hwaci.com/v1/ No CSS of any kind. >(2) http://sqlite.hwaci.com/v2/ CSS menus with rounded corners >(3) http://sqlite.hwaci.com/v3/ CSS menus with square corners >(4)

Re: AW: AW: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

Matthias Zirngibl wrote: Arg! "cvs -v" tells me 1.11.5, which is ancient. I've been doing apt-get update apt-get upgrade which I thought was suppose to keep me up to date with all security patches. But I guess not Anonymous CVS access has been disabled until I can get this fixed.

Re: AW: AW: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

Matthias Zirngibl wrote: Arg! "cvs -v" tells me 1.11.5, which is ancient. I've been doing apt-get update apt-get upgrade which I thought was suppose to keep me up to date with all security patches. But I guess not Anonymous CVS access has been disabled until I can get this fixed.

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

Cesare D'Amico wrote: Did you update your kernel (and rebooted) recently? Various vulnerabilities have been discovered during the last months (debian network has been cracked too, some months ago). Kernel version 2.4.26 up 26 days. Attack was 3 days ago. -- D. Richard Hipp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

Marco Bambini wrote: On 25/giu/04, at 17:34, D. Richard Hipp wrote: 3 days ago, somebody broke into the SQLite website and defaced the CVSTrac homepage. (www.cvstrac.org and www.sqlite.org share the same machine.) You are not alone:

AW: AW: AW: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

> apt-upgrade is giving me the following error. Can anyone explain? > > > Setting up util-linux (2.11n-7) ... > dpkg: error processing util-linux (--configure): > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit > status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: > util-linux > E:

Re: AW: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

D. Richard Hipp wrote: Arg! "cvs -v" tells me 1.11.5, which is ancient. I've been doing apt-get update apt-get upgrade which I thought was suppose to keep me up to date with all security patches. But I guess not For Debian 'woody' the latest cvs is 1.11.1p1, for Debian 'sarge' the

Re: AW: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

"D. Richard Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Somebody please instruct me on the proper way to get security > updates for debian Be sure you have the following line in /etc/apt/sources.list and prior to doing "apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade" deb http://security.debian.org/

AW: AW: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

> Arg! "cvs -v" tells me 1.11.5, which is ancient. I've been doing > > apt-get update > apt-get upgrade > > which I thought was suppose to keep me up to date with all > security patches. But I guess not > > Anonymous CVS access has been disabled until I can get this fixed. > >

[sqlite] SQLite website hacked

I recall, recently the CVS website posting a "security bulletin" They had to entirely rebuild their site. This was because the pserver (cvs bacground server) had a serious security flaw that allowed an attacker to run commands on the host. Here is a link to the details!!!

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

Alle 17:34, venerdì 25 giugno 2004, D. Richard Hipp ha scritto: > Anybody have any clues how an attacker might have gotten in? > Does anybody have any advice on how best to secure the system? Did you update your kernel (and rebooted) recently? Various vulnerabilities have been discovered during

AW: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

> On 25/giu/04, at 17:34, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > > 3 days ago, somebody broke into the SQLite website and defaced the > > CVSTrac homepage. (www.cvstrac.org and www.sqlite.org > share the same > > machine.) > > You are not alone: >

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

On 25/giu/04, at 17:34, D. Richard Hipp wrote: 3 days ago, somebody broke into the SQLite website and defaced the CVSTrac homepage. (www.cvstrac.org and www.sqlite.org share the same machine.) You are not alone: http://www.zone-h.org/en/defacements/filter/filter_defacer=Russel-Aid/ Details at:

Re: [sqlite] SQLite website hacked

It looks like you were not the only person to have their webserver hacked . Since you are running an "atypical" web server, chances are the cracker got in with either a Linux root kit, a ssh flaw,

[sqlite] SQLite website hacked

3 days ago, somebody broke into the SQLite website and defaced the CVSTrac homepage. (www.cvstrac.org and www.sqlite.org share the same machine.) I do not know how the attacker got in. The message left on the homepage of www.cvstrac.org was "Rooted by Russel-Aid'. www.sqlite.org runs a minimal