On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 3/7/2013 16:14, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jeff Archer > **com
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Will SQLite4 be capable of reading a SQLite3 database to facilitate
>>> upgrade? (I'm guessing 'no')
>>>
>>>
>> No.
>>
On 3/7/2013 16:14, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jeff Archer
wrote:
Will SQLite4 be capable of reading a SQLite3 database to facilitate
upgrade? (I'm guessing 'no')
No.
Is it expected to be language-compatible, at least, so you can slurp in
a .dump file?
I mean
> > Will it be feasible to include the amalgamation of both SQLite3 and
SQLite4
> > into the same application to create an upgrade facility?
> >
>
> Yes. The two share no symbols in common, so you should be able to link
> them both. (This is something we need to test before the first release.)
T
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jeff Archer wrote:
> Will SQLite4 be capable of reading a SQLite3 database to facilitate
> upgrade? (I'm guessing 'no')
>
No.
>
> I assume SQLite4 will be distributed in a familiar amalgamation format.
>
Yes. You can already type "make sqlite4.c". The amalga
Will SQLite4 be capable of reading a SQLite3 database to facilitate
upgrade? (I'm guessing 'no')
I assume SQLite4 will be distributed in a familiar amalgamation format.
Will it be feasible to include the amalgamation of both SQLite3 and SQLite4
into the same application to create an upgrade facil
5 matches
Mail list logo