On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Levente Kovacs
> wrote:
>
>> I started to worry about this issue, because I am in a middle of an
>> application development, and yesterday, it started to work,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Levente Kovacs
wrote:
> I started to worry about this issue, because I am in a middle of an
> application development, and yesterday, it started to work, and I only
> SELECT
> a few times, and it makes a noticeable disk access. I'm still
I started to worry about this issue, because I am in a middle of an
application development, and yesterday, it started to work, and I only SELECT
a few times, and it makes a noticeable disk access. I'm still on magnetic HDD,
but the application will be running on SSD or Flash drive.
Let me start
Simon Slavin wrote:
On 16 Aug 2014, at 9:32pm, Baruch Burstein wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Levente wrote:
I am thinking about putting an SQLite database on a flash drive (SD card).
I would like to know what kind of file system is
On 16 Aug 2014, at 9:32pm, Baruch Burstein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Levente wrote:
>
>> I am thinking about putting an SQLite database on a flash drive (SD card).
>> I would like to know what kind of file system is the optimal. I
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Levente wrote:
> I am thinking about putting an SQLite database on a flash drive (SD card).
> I would like to know what kind of file system is the optimal. I want to
> query a lot, and insert or update a few times per minute.
>
Not
I am thinking about putting an SQLite database on a flash drive (SD card).
I would like to know what kind of file system is the optimal. I want to
query a lot, and insert or update a few times per minute.
The goal is to minimize disk writes, which leads the FLASH to wear out.
After some googling
7 matches
Mail list logo