On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Marco Bambini wrote:
> I am sorry Dr. Hipp, I am probably doing something wrong, but I just
> retried and no sessions code is in-line in the final sqlite3.c file.
>
> I downloaded:
>
> http://www.sqlite.org/src/zip/SQLite-d07b7b67d1b3bf65.zip?uuid=d07b7b67d1b3bf6
I am sorry Dr. Hipp, I am probably doing something wrong, but I just retried
and no sessions code is in-line in the final sqlite3.c file.
I downloaded:
http://www.sqlite.org/src/zip/SQLite-d07b7b67d1b3bf65.zip?uuid=d07b7b67d1b3bf65cfe8d96d45a7f1d387bea7ce
then
cd SQLite-d07b7b67d1b3bf65
./confi
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Marco Bambini wrote:
> I just tried to download:
> http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/d07b7b67d1
> from the session branch.
>
> Then:
> ./configure; make sqlite3.c
> but no session module is included in the amalgamation sqlite3.c file.
>
All of the sessions code is i
I just tried to download:
http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/d07b7b67d1
from the session branch.
Then:
./configure; make sqlite3.c
but no session module is included in the amalgamation sqlite3.c file.
>From the executed cp command:
cp -f ./src/alter.c ./src/analyze.c ./src/attach.c ./src/auth.c ./src
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Charles Samuels wrote:
> On Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:53:18 f.h. Richard Hipp wrote:
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Charles Samuels >wrote:
> > > So, I'd like to ask what's wrong with the session extension that it's
> > > never been rolled into the main dist
On Thursday, May 31, 2012 11:53:18 f.h. Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Charles Samuels wrote:
> > So, I'd like to ask what's wrong with the session extension that it's
> > never been rolled into the main distribution and hasn't been worked on
> > since 2011 July?
>
> The se
: Re: [sqlite] The "sessions" branch
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Charles Samuels wrote:
>
> So, I'd like to ask what's wrong with the session extension that it's
> never been rolled into the main distribution and hasn't been worked on
> since 2011
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Charles Samuels wrote:
>
> So, I'd like to ask what's wrong with the session extension that it's never
> been rolled into the main distribution and hasn't been worked on since 2011
> July?
>
The sessions branch is stable and fully supported and will continue to be
Hi,
I couldn't help but notice that in the sqlite fossil repository, there's a
branch named "sessions" which has this:
http://www.sqlite.org/cgi/src/dir?name=ext/session
This is a very useful feature for me because it would allow me to rollback a
change after it's been committed (if somehow I
9 matches
Mail list logo
