Daniel K ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Can you try the following experiment and post the
> results:
> CREATE TABLE tbl(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b INTEGER);
> INSERT INTO tbl VALUES( -1, 1.12589990684e+15 );
> SELECT * FROM tbl;
> and see what happens. If you get the right value
> back (-1,
=== On 2004-06-19, D. Richard Hipp wrote ===
>The missing routines were added to Tcl/Tk in version 8.3.
>Version 8.4.6 is current. Strange that Gentoo would be using
>the very latest version of GCC but still have an archaic
>version of TCL.
>
>I think it is not unreasonable to require Tcl 8.4 in o
ok, I am using tcl-8.3.4 so that explains it.
Regards,
~Nuno Lucas
=== On 2004-06-19, Daniel K wrote ===
>To fix this you need a TCL upgrade. Any 8.4.* will
>work.
>Dan.
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
Nuno Lucas wrote:
The same warnings happen on Linux (Gentoo 1.4), gcc-3.3.3.
The output of your test gives:
/tmp/ccUvOu6w.o(.text+0x15a7): In function `test_bind_int64':
./sqlite-cvs/src/test1.c:1057: undefined reference to `Tcl_GetWideIntFromObj'
/tmp/ccUvOu6w.o(.text+0x21ec): In function `test_co
Le samedi 19 Juin 2004 13:48, Daniel K a écrit :
> To fix this you need a TCL upgrade. Any 8.4.* will
Thanks. Maybe this could fix my make doc problem too.
I use tcl-8.3.5 for now.
I'll try an upgrade.
--
JCR
aka DJ Anubis
LAB Project Initiator & coordinator
--
To fix this you need a TCL upgrade. Any 8.4.* will
work.
Dan.
--- Nuno Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The same warnings happen on Linux (Gentoo 1.4),
> gcc-3.3.3.
> The output of your test gives:
>
>
---
> sqlite> CREATE TABLE tbl(a INT
The same warnings happen on Linux (Gentoo 1.4), gcc-3.3.3.
The output of your test gives:
---
sqlite> CREATE TABLE tbl(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b INTEGER);
sqlite> INSERT INTO tbl VALUES( -1, 1.12589990684e+15 );
sqlite> SELECT * FROM tbl;
-1|1
Can you try the following experiment and post the
results:
CREATE TABLE tbl(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b INTEGER);
INSERT INTO tbl VALUES( -1, 1.12589990684e+15 );
SELECT * FROM tbl;
and see what happens. If you get the right value
back (-1, 112589990684) then I think the warnings
are harmless.
hello,
compiling SQLite 3.0.0 in an cygwin environment I am getting compiler
warnings:
../sqlite/src/util.c:1175: warning: integer constant is too large for
"long" typ
../sqlite/src/vdbe.c:3022: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" typ
../sqlite/src/vdbe.c:3029: warning: integer cons
9 matches
Mail list logo
