2011/4/22 Richard Hipp
> I do not believe any of these things have any impact on stack depth. But
> you should probably double-check by running the experiment.
Ok.
> Please let us
> know if you find me wrong.
Yes.
Thank you a lot! Kind regards and happy holidays, Mikael
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Mikael wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
> If by recursion you mean a subselect or alike, then the SQL queries we have
> are of a constant recursion level, generally 0 and 4 or so at max, in any
> dynamically generated query. Also the depth counted
Dear Richard,
If by recursion you mean a subselect or alike, then the SQL queries we have
are of a constant recursion level, generally 0 and 4 or so at max, in any
dynamically generated query. Also the depth counted in parentheses of WHERE
expressions is constant, 5 or so at max.
What varies in
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Mikael wrote:
> Aha great.
>
> Is 12KB the amount of stack space needed on any x64 platform upon unlimited
> use (i.e. whatever size and complexity of SQL queries, whatever dataset/DB
> size etc.) with the default configuration/installation?
Aha great.
Is 12KB the amount of stack space needed on any x64 platform upon unlimited
use (i.e. whatever size and complexity of SQL queries, whatever dataset/DB
size etc.) with the default configuration/installation?
If not, is there any particular stack size that you would consider a 'safe'
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Mikael wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at the possibility of using SQLite in an environment with a
> fixed-size stack, and wish to know, what stack size do I need for SQLite
> always to work?
>
We have heard of people running SQLite in as
Hi,
I'm looking at the possibility of using SQLite in an environment with a
fixed-size stack, and wish to know, what stack size do I need for SQLite
always to work?
Obviously I want it to be as small as possible, as I want as much RAM to be
available for other purposes as possible.
The
7 matches
Mail list logo