>>
>>
>>> kdb "select * from kfz where CRC32=-1509747892;"
>>> 48482364|48|0|0C|00|00|0||20|5B93|-1509747892|||0|GP-T 1006|0
>>> 20209667|20|1|3C|00|32|202880||99|4FBD|-1509747892|||0|FL-AK 98|1
>>> 20209667|20|1|3C|00|32|202880||99|4FBD|-1509747892|||0|FL-AK 98|1
>>
>> What could cause 48482364
"Marian Aldenhoevel"
wrote in
message news:49a65fac.5060...@mba-software.de
> I am having a strange problem with a sqlite3 database. See the
> following transcript:
>
>> sqlite3 kdb "select * from kfz where kfznr=48482364;"
>>
Hi,
>> > CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS KFZ (
>
> Is that as reported by the command-line sqlite3 executable program, or
> is it from some script that you hope is the one that was used to create
> the table?
That is from the script I _know_ is the one that created the table. I
will send output
On 26/02/2009 9:45 PM, John Machin wrote:
> On 26/02/2009 8:23 PM, Marian Aldenhoevel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am having a strange problem with a sqlite3 database. See the following
>> transcript:
>>
>> > sqlite3 kdb "select * from kfz where kfznr=48482364;"
>> >
On 26/02/2009 8:23 PM, Marian Aldenhoevel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having a strange problem with a sqlite3 database. See the following
> transcript:
>
> > sqlite3 kdb "select * from kfz where kfznr=48482364;"
> > 48482364|48|0|0C|00|00|0||20|5B93|1746294314|||0|GP-T 1006|0
>
> kfznr is the
is a good sign.
-Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Unangst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 1:28 PM
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Indexing problem
>
> Thomas Briggs wrote:
>
> >I think the common
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 10:27 -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Two tables in a where can use two indices in sqlite?
>
Correct. SQLite (and every other SQL RDBMS that I know
of) uses as many as but no more than one index per table
in a join. If the same table is used more than once in
a join, then
Thomas Briggs wrote:
I think the common misconception is that indexes on multiple
individual columns can be used in conjunction with one another, which
isn't the case (unless you're talking about bitmap indexes, but since
SQLite doesn't have those, we clearly aren't :P). Once you get
> I was puzzled that removing the single-column index on
> Season actually enabled the original query to
> complete, having read somewhere in the sqlite docs
> that indexing columns used in WHERE conditions
> improves performance. Is this something to do with the
That's a true statement in
Without having seen the EXPLAIN output for the query both with and
without the indexes present: the indexes you've created don't really
support your query very well. Of the six indexes that you've created, I
believe that only one can be used, so I'd speculate that the cause of
the slowdown is
10 matches
Mail list logo