RE: [sqlite] Very wide tables and performance

2006-09-15 Thread Denis Povshedny
] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:42 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] Very wide tables and performance Hi Dennis, This is an OLAP product and indeed we don't know upfront how much of that data is relevant to the processing. I had a normalized group of tables for those

Re: [sqlite] Very wide tables and performance

2006-09-14 Thread jose simas
d probably not only me) am very excited to see definition for this table ;) WBR, Denis -Original Message- From: jose simas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:05 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] Very wide tables and performance Thanks for you

RE: [sqlite] Very wide tables and performance

2006-09-14 Thread Denis Povshedny
databases. Anyway, I (and probably not only me) am very excited to see definition for this table ;) WBR, Denis -Original Message- From: jose simas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:05 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] Very wide tables and

Re: [sqlite] Very wide tables and performance

2006-09-13 Thread jose simas
Thanks for your answers! I am very happy with SQLite as it is I was just wondering if I could improve it for this case. I am using tables with this configuration for performance reasons. I have to support an indeterminate number of columns (user data) and a "normal" design is not as fast as this

Re: [sqlite] Very wide tables and performance

2006-09-13 Thread Dennis Cote
jose simas wrote: My application uses SQLite as its file format and up to two of the tables can have several thousand columns (up to 20 or 30 thousand at times). When I open a connection there's a noticeable pause (around one second on a file with a table of 7,000 columns, for example). There is

Re: [sqlite] Very wide tables and performance

2006-09-13 Thread drh
"jose simas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When I open a connection there's a noticeable pause (around one second > on a file with a table of 7,000 columns, for example). There is also a > noticeable delay in sorting them by the primary key. > While there is no limit to the number of columns in