Re: [sqlite] fts2 in the amalgamation source?

I have modified the Makefile, so I have added: SRC += \ $(TOP)/ext/fts2/fts2.c \ $(TOP)/ext/fts2/fts2.h \ $(TOP)/ext/fts2/fts2_hash.c \ $(TOP)/ext/fts2/fts2_hash.h \ $(TOP)/ext/fts2/fts2_porter.c \ $(TOP)/ext/fts2/fts2_tokenizer.h \ $(TOP)/ext/fts2/fts2_tokenizer1.c make sqlite3.c

Re: [sqlite] fts2 in the amalgamation source?

"David Crawshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I was wondering if it would be possible to include fts2 in the > amalgamated version of the source code. It looks like all that needs > to be done is add > > tclsh $(TOP)/ext/fts2/mkfts2amal.tcl > > to the end of the target_source

Re: [sqlite] fts2 in the amalgamation source?

I guess that the sqlite authors only want to include the core library in the amalgamation and rely on loadable extension modules for the rest. Perhaps fts1 and fts2 could be statically added to the amalgomation, but ifdef'd out by default. --- David Crawshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was w

RE: [sqlite] fts2 in the amalgamation source?

Unless something changed recently that I missed, fts2 is not a standard part of sqlite so including it in the standard amalgamation would be a big change. Having two distributions, one with and one without, might make sense though. Or including it with an OMIT flag would work too (default to omi