----- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] sqliteOsEnterMutex() and sqliteOsLeaveMutex()
>
>
>
>
>
> as someone who's trying to give up smoking
Le ven 16/07/2004 à 10:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> - second, i wish people would keep politics and religion out of this forum
> (""OS" and ""windows" in the same sentence ??? Ha.") windows has
> contributed more to the economic health of this planet that any other
> single technology.
CARIOTOGLOU MIKE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unsolicited advice: Your best bet is to run no more than one thread
>> in each process. If you need multiple threads, create multiple
>> processes to contain them. Writing applications with multiple
>> threads in the same address space is like
the radio in the 1920s.
> -Original Message-
> From: CARIOTOGLOU MIKE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 18:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [sqlite] sqliteOsEnterMutex() and sqliteOsLeaveMutex()
>
>
>
> > Unsolicited advice: You
> Unsolicited advice: Your best bet is to run no more than one thread
> in each process. If you need multiple threads, create multiple
> processes to contain them. Writing applications with multiple
> threads in the same address space is like smoking cigarettes: it
> gives you a buzz, but in
5 matches
Mail list logo
