"Lists Hammersley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you want to preserve the traditional File/Open + File/Save
> > semantics, you could create an in-memory SQLite database then
> > copy the disk database to the in-memory database on File/Op
On 6/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you want to preserve the traditional File/Open + File/Save
semantics, you could create an in-memory SQLite database then
copy the disk database to the in-memory database on File/Open,
and copy the other way on File/Save.
Doesn't this re
"Lists Hammersley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have an existing application which stores data out to flat files.
> We would like to use SQLite as the storage mechanism for column-like
> data, other datatypes would remain in flat-files. However, there are a
> few use cases which make it diff
3 matches
Mail list logo