Hi Simon,
I already read your previous replies, but to revisit my scenaro:
- My OS is sensitive to fragmentation
- We are running with auto-vacuum enabled, so the freelist_count is usually
small (not a good indicator)
but fragmentation supposedly gets worse
-We use sqlite as application
I have an asp.net application.
I open a sqlite in-memory connection with SQLiteConnection conn = new
SQLiteConnection ( Data Source=:memory: ); command.
I read that by using cache=shared parameter, I can make that in-memory database
reachable from other connections.
1.What is the way of
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:46 AM, T Ü shocking_blue2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have an asp.net application.
I open a sqlite in-memory connection with SQLiteConnection conn = new
SQLiteConnection ( Data Source=:memory: ); command.
I read that by using cache=shared parameter, I can make that
On 5 Jul 2012, at 9:34am, _ph_ hauptma...@yahoo.com wrote:
I already read your previous replies, but to revisit my scenaro:
- My OS is sensitive to fragmentation
- We are running with auto-vacuum enabled, so the freelist_count is usually
small (not a good indicator)
Ah. If you're always
By trying I found out that SQLiteConnection(Data
Source=:memory:;cache=shared); worked.
In a single aspx.page at cs code, first I open an in-memory database connection
SQLiteConnection conn = new SQLiteConnection ( Data
Source=:memory:;cache=shared );
conn.Open();
than create
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:37 AM, T Ü shocking_blue2...@yahoo.com wrote:
By trying I found out that SQLiteConnection(Data
Source=:memory:;cache=shared); worked.
In a single aspx.page at cs code, first I open an in-memory database
connection
SQLiteConnection conn = new SQLiteConnection (
It returns 3.6.23.1
From: Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com
To: T Ü shocking_blue2...@yahoo.com
Cc: General Discussion of SQLite Database sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Multiple connections to in-memory
So this feature shouldn't work for you. From my first message:
But this possibility was
introduced in SQLite 3.7.13. So your asp.net provider should be
compiled with the latest version of SQLite, otherwise it won't work.
Pavel
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:56 AM, T Ü shocking_blue2...@yahoo.com
Thank you so much Pavel. I will try with the new version.
From: Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com
To: T Ü shocking_blue2...@yahoo.com
Cc: General Discussion of SQLite Database sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: [sqlite]
On 05/07/12 01:05, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Alan Chandlera...@chandlerfamily.org.ukwrote:
The commit referenced by that page:
http://www.sqlite.org/src/info/b23ae131874bc5c621f0
went into 3.7.9. So the problem was probably introduced in
3.7.9, not 3.7.10.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/12 05:29, Simon Slavin wrote:
Fragmentation of the database file on disk is something that SQLite
can't control,
However you can ask SQLite to do things that will mitigate fragmentation
by extending the file in larger blocks. See the file
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:00:55AM +0200, Domingo Alvarez Duarte scratched on
the wall:
Hello !
I did a modification to the LUA regex code to allow using it without
LUA dependency so it can be used with sqlite as regex function.
Very handy!
It's very light and small thus a good
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:29:18PM +0100, Simon Slavin scratched on the wall:
On 5 Jul 2012, at 9:34am, _ph_ hauptma...@yahoo.com wrote:
I already read your previous replies, but to revisit my scenaro:
- My OS is sensitive to fragmentation
- We are running with auto-vacuum enabled,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:03:54AM -0400, Pavel Ivanov scratched on the wall:
So this feature shouldn't work for you. From my first message:
But this possibility was
introduced in SQLite 3.7.13. So your asp.net provider should be
compiled with the latest version of SQLite, otherwise it
On Jul 4, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Domingo Alvarez Duarte wrote:
I did a modification to the LUA regex code to allow using it without
LUA dependency so it can be used with sqlite as regex function.
Well done. Lua [1] and SQLite are made for each other :)
[1] http://www.lua.org/about.html#name
In the key encoding page you talk about encoding E as a varint, and in
some cases -E as a varint, but the page on varint says they are
unsigned. I assume that -E == ~E + 1 (i.e., two's complement of E),
and that ~E == one's complement of E.
Nico
--
___
I am working on converting my system table from one form to another. The
old form was one row per value with a category/key/value (DBLookup) , the
new form is a separate column for each value (PP_VIEWER_SETTINGS). I am
trying to create an insert statement to run when the new table is created,
The insert statement below should insert one row into table
PP_VIEWER_SETTINGS. Does it do that? Is it what you called does not
work? To insert several rows you need to write a huge join of
dblookup to itself, so your insert statement should look like this:
insert into PP_VIEWER_SETTINGS (...)
Can anybody explain to me how to set up my sqlite database file with my
Linux server?
To my limited knowledge, i have uploaded the following files in a directory
on my server:
1. sqlite.db
2. form.php
Do i have to also upload the command shell?? I am confident in the php and
sqlite code and
In file os_win.c in line 2052 must be:
if( locktype==PENDING_LOCK res ){
instead of:
if( locktype==EXCLUSIVE_LOCK res ){
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
I am fairly new to database development and I am working on an embedded system
where we are utilizing SQLite to manage some files and other information that
is being shared between processes. What I am doing is I have the SQLite
amalgamation source code that I am compiling into each binary
sqlite CREATE TABLE test_base(id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY);
sqlite CREATE TABLE test_join(id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
base_id INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES test_base(id), value NUMERIC NOT
NULL);
sqlite INSERT INTO test_base VALUES(1);
sqlite INSERT INTO test_join VALUES(1, 1, 0);
sqlite
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jonathan Haws
jonathan.h...@sdl.usu.edu wrote:
I am fairly new to database development and I am working on an embedded
system where we are utilizing SQLite to manage some files and other
information that is being shared between processes. What I am doing is I
sqlite SELECT test_base.id, SUM(test_join.value) FROM test_base LEFT
JOIN test_join ON test_join.base_id = test_base.id GROUP BY
test_base.id HAVING SUM(test_join.value)='0';
sqlite
The last statement generates no results. There is no mention of a
special case for HAVING so I would assume
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
In the key encoding page you talk about encoding E as a varint, and in
some cases -E as a varint, but the page on varint says they are
unsigned. I assume that -E == ~E + 1 (i.e., two's complement of E),
and that ~E ==
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:06 AM, mc...@ukr.net wrote:
In file os_win.c in line 2052 must be:
if( locktype==PENDING_LOCK res ){
instead of:
if( locktype==EXCLUSIVE_LOCK res ){
No. Code is correct as written. The SQLite core never actually requests a
PENDING lock. PENDING is only an
26 matches
Mail list logo
