On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Igor Tandetnik itandet...@mvps.org wrote:
Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Igor Tandetnik itandet...@mvps.org wrote:
On 9/13/2012 4:39 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:24 PM, Igor Tandetnik
Hello,
I want to use System.Data.SQLite by invoking it via
DbProviderFactories.GetFactory(providerName). If I have an old version
installed on my machine I always get that instead of the one inside the
referenced NuGet package. If uninstall it, the call fails because it cannot be
found.
I
Felix Obermaier wrote:
Doesn't it make sense to add such a config file to the NuGet package?
I'm somewhat hesitant to add more complexity to the NuGet packages,
especially since not every project requires this database provider
block in their configuration file. The additional complexity
Hello,
I work on an application that uses an SQLite database as it's binary document
format (with a custom extension). Now we want to develop a Web App variation of
that application, that should be able to read and write those
documents/databases. Since the Web App is written in Javascript, I
At line 14573 require add (char *) for convert from (void *)
z = (char *)sqlite3DbMallocRaw(db, (int)n);
Sent from my Windows 8 PC
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
Igor, you didn't read ArbolOne's incomprehensible code correctly. Here it is
with reasonable formatting:
void mySQLite3::setStmt(const Glib::ustring s)
{
SQLStatement = s;
if (mystmt == NULL)
{
rc =
Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
There's another way how it could make sense - if you read that excerpt
in context. ;-) The statement-level read consistency definition
cited by Petite is the transaction isolation level. I.e. it defines
what each statement executed in one transaction can
Chang Li changli...@hotmail.com wrote:
At line 14573 require add (char *) for convert from (void *)
z = (char *)sqlite3DbMallocRaw(db, (int)n);
Are you, by any chance, trying to compile in C++ mode? SQLite is written in C,
where such a cast is not required.
--
Igor Tandetnik
On 13 Sep 2012, at 3:13pm, Jean-Denis Muys jdm...@cmd-informatique.com wrote:
I work on an application that uses an SQLite database as it's binary document
format (with a custom extension). Now we want to develop a Web App variation
of that application, that should be able to read and write
Jean-Denis Muys wrote:
I am now looking for a Javascript implementation of the SQLite library.
https://github.com/kripken/sql.js says:
| sql.js is a port of SQLite to JavaScript, by compiling the SQLite
| C code with Emscripten.
It's completely in-memory, but:
| Database objects ... have the
There is a version of SQLite compiled in Javascript:
http://www.syntensity.com/static/sqlite_wip.html
But as others said, it is not possible to do block access on files from
inside a Web browser's contained Javascript VM.
Nevertheless, theoretically you could load the full DB file in memory
I work on an application that uses an SQLite database as it's binary document
format (with a custom extension). Now we want to develop a Web App variation
of that application, that should be able to read and write those
documents/databases. Since the Web App is written in Javascript, I am
Hello Igor,
Friday, September 14, 2012, 8:59:54 AM, you wrote:
IT Chang Li changli...@hotmail.com wrote:
At line 14573 require add (char *) for convert from (void *)
z = (char *)sqlite3DbMallocRaw(db, (int)n);
IT Are you, by any chance, trying to compile in C++ mode? SQLite is
IT written in
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Igor Tandetnik itandet...@mvps.org wrote:
Pavel Ivanov paiva...@gmail.com wrote:
There's another way how it could make sense - if you read that excerpt
in context. ;-) The statement-level read consistency definition
cited by Petite is the transaction isolation
On 9/14/2012 10:36 AM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Igor Tandetnik itandet...@mvps.org wrote:
Wait a minute. If statement-level read consistency only applies to two queries in
different transactions, what bearing, if any, does it have on your example of open, fetch,
Elefterios Stamatogiannakis wrote:
On 13/09/12 23:02, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
Eleytherios Stamatogiannakis wrote:
Is there a reason for SQLite to not use a covering index for scans?
The query optimizer does not allow indexes that are not needed for some
DISTINCT, WHERE, or ORDER BY clause:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there a chance that the change will go into SQLite mainline?
Not without a copyright release.
And it may require more especially if you are an employee. See the bottom
section of http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html
And of course it is more
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Igor Tandetnik itandet...@mvps.org wrote:
On 9/14/2012 10:36 AM, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Igor Tandetnik itandet...@mvps.org
wrote:
Wait a minute. If statement-level read consistency only applies to two
queries in different
18 matches
Mail list logo
