Hi,
I am gonna try first creating unique index (hid, pid). It will take a bit
of time and will keep you posted with the result.
Thanks a lot
Gaurav
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Simon Slavin slav...@bigfraud.org wrote:
On 24 Nov 2011, at 7:54am, Gaurav Vyas wrote:
when I do typeof(hid
I am trying to get a chunk of rows from a table which has 16 million rows.
The table is indexed. I am passing the query as SELECT * FROM persons
WHERE hid = 5; and it takes a few minutes to get me the results. Can
anyone suggest how to make it faster?
Gaurav
2011, at 7:45am, Gaurav Vyas wrote:
I am trying to get a chunk of rows from a table which has 16 million
rows.
The table is indexed. I am passing the query as SELECT * FROM persons
WHERE hid = 5; and it takes a few minutes to get me the results. Can
anyone suggest how to make it faster
?
And if it is... what's its selectivity?
What 's the query plan?
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
--
Gaurav Vyas
Graduate Research Assistant, Transportation Engineering
University
turning optimization off entirely, or to its lowest
setting ?
Simon.
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
--
Gaurav Vyas
Graduate Research Assistant, Transportation
Here is the situation. I am using a cluster on which you can use MPI to
split the processing time on to different processors. I was using
PostgreSQL but since the data was on different server than the one I am
running the code, it was slowing down the simulation due to connection
overhead on