On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Frank Church vfcli...@gmail.com wrote:
On checking the sqlite3.dll docs it states the only additional requirement
for it is msvcrt.dll.
Frank, as long as I know it's just a variation of sqlite3.dll that uses MS C
run-time dynamically linked vs statically. You
I have tried to install a program using SQLite3.dll on Windows systems and
it appears to fail repeatedly on Windows 2000 systems.
On checking the sqlite3.dll docs it states the only additional requirement
for it is msvcrt.dll. Is that known to be a problem, or could it be
something else? I just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 12:01 AM, Frank Church wrote:
and Windows 2000.
Mainstream support ended 5 years ago, and all support ends in just over
a month, no matter how much money anyone is prepared to throw at them:
Am Sat, 5 Jun 2010 08:01:31 +0100 schrieb Frank Church:
On checking the sqlite3.dll docs it states the only additional requirement
for it is msvcrt.dll. Is that known to be a problem, or could it be
something else? I just want to know if there are some other known issues
between sqlite3.dll
Roger Binns a écrit :
But in fact sqlite runs perfectly fine on windows2000 and is compilable
with any free compiler (mingw for instance)
Best regards
Noël Frankinet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 12:01 AM, Frank Church wrote:
and Windows 2000.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 04:21 AM, noel frankinet wrote:
But in fact sqlite runs perfectly fine on windows2000
Exactly as my second paragraph says. But in the Windows 2000 time frame
applications used to install their own copies of msvcrt.dll in the system
Roger Binns a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 04:21 AM, noel frankinet wrote:
But in fact sqlite runs perfectly fine on windows2000
Exactly as my second paragraph says. But in the Windows 2000 time frame
applications used to install their own
Hello noel,
Well, I have a large install base of users both foreign and US
based and most of them still use XP. The benefit of Windows 2000 is
that it's easily pirated (more easily than XP is what I mean). My
software still works under Win2k, though the users have to install a
a DLL from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 08:20 AM, noel frankinet wrote:
I see windows 2000 as the finest os that redmont has produced. You'd
better not develop on the latest ms os if you want to have some
installed base.
Your opinion is fine, but someone has to bear the
Roger Binns a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/05/2010 08:20 AM, noel frankinet wrote:
I see windows 2000 as the finest os that redmont has produced. You'd
better not develop on the latest ms os if you want to have some
installed base.
Your opinion
You can find out definitively whether your problems are a missing DLL on
that particular system by using Dependency Walker:
http://www.dependencywalker.com/
Run the app and load Sqlite3.dll. If dependent DLLs are missing, it will
highlight them. Similarly, you can load up other DLLs and EXEs
11 matches
Mail list logo
