: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [mailto:sqlite-users-
boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan Ureche
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 2:51 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] is ticket 4037 not a bug?
I can imagine query generators tend to use more, possibly
redundant
Allan,
Thank you very much for the reply. You are correct when stating that,
according to SQLite documentation this SQL syntax is not expected to work.
Therefore, it is not a bug. Perhaps it should be added to the list of SQL92
features unsupported by SQLite.
But I am asking myself: was that
Bogdan Ureche wrote:
Allan,
Thank you very much for the reply. You are correct when stating that,
according to SQLite documentation this SQL syntax is not expected to work.
Therefore, it is not a bug. Perhaps it should be added to the list of SQL92
features unsupported by SQLite.
IMHO it's
On 11/17/09 6:10 , Bogdan Ureche bogdan...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Is this a bug or not? If not, any reason why not?
2. Are other databases supporting this syntax?
3. Is this an invalid syntax according to the SQL standard?
4. Is there a workaround?
I would appreciate any help.
Bogdan
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Roger Binns rog...@rogerbinns.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bogdan Ureche wrote:
I just noticed the ticket was closed without being fixed, with the following
remark:
I was the one who closed it and added that remark.
Now, I have
Many thanks to all who replied, that was very helpful. So the ticket was
closed because the old CVSTRACKER was closed, and a new ticket should be
created with the replacement mechanism, after being discussed in the mailing
list. @Roger: I apologize for the misunderstanding.
If
it alters the
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:49:58 -0800, Roger Binns
rog...@rogerbinns.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bogdan Ureche wrote:
I just noticed the ticket was closed without being fixed, with the following
remark:
I was the one who closed it and added that remark.
Now, I have
I can imagine query generators tend to use more, possibly
redundant, qualifiers than a human programmer would.
--
( Kees Nuyt
)
c[_]
That may be true but sometimes the qualifiers are needed to avoid ambiguity,
in which case they are not redundant.
Bogdan
Hi,
A few weeks ago I created ticket 4037 with the description:
The following query
select databasename.tablename.* from databasename.tablename
returns:
near *: syntax error
However, the following query returns no error:
select databasename.tablename.fieldname from databasename.tablename
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bogdan Ureche wrote:
I just noticed the ticket was closed without being fixed, with the following
remark:
I was the one who closed it and added that remark.
Now, I have to admit that English is not my first language, nor the second,
but the way
10 matches
Mail list logo
