FWIW - you can still get a textual description at
http://www.sqlite.org/syntax.html
...
/jum
Am 20.04.2009 um 15:59 schrieb J. King:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:59:02 -0400, Jean-Denis Muys jdm...@kleegroup.com
wrote:
It's a shame: I far preferred the BNF: more compact, not to
mention
Very thanks!
2009/4/20 D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com
On Apr 20, 2009, at 12:38 AM, ntr wrote:
Hi all,
Is any one knows what tool do they use to generate the SYNTAX (railroad)
diagrams
that describing the SQL Syntax ??
(on http://www.sqlite.org/syntaxdiagrams.html)
Hi all,
Is any one knows what tool do they use to generate the SYNTAX (railroad)
diagrams
that describing the SQL Syntax ??
(on http://www.sqlite.org/syntaxdiagrams.html)
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
On Apr 20, 2009, at 12:38 AM, ntr wrote:
Hi all,
Is any one knows what tool do they use to generate the SYNTAX
(railroad)
diagrams
that describing the SQL Syntax ??
(on http://www.sqlite.org/syntaxdiagrams.html)
http://wiki.tcl.tk/21708
D. Richard Hipp
d...@hwaci.com
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:53:37 -0400, D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote:
http://wiki.tcl.tk/21708
It's a shame: I far preferred the BNF: more compact, not to mention you
could copy and paste as well as search the text of the syntax itself.
--
J. King
On 4/20/09 2:35 PM, J. King jk...@jkingweb.ca wrote:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:53:37 -0400, D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote:
http://wiki.tcl.tk/21708
It's a shame: I far preferred the BNF: more compact, not to mention you
could copy and paste as well as search the text of the syntax
J. King schrieb:
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:53:37 -0400, D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote:
http://wiki.tcl.tk/21708
It's a shame: I far preferred the BNF: more compact, not to mention you
could copy and paste as well as search the text of the syntax itself.
I guess it wouldn't be too
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:59:02 -0400, Jean-Denis Muys jdm...@kleegroup.com
wrote:
It's a shame: I far preferred the BNF: more compact, not to mention you
could copy and paste as well as search the text of the syntax itself.
shame? Are you sure that's the word you wanted to use?
Quite sure,
