Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4-based random (3.3.15)

2007-05-15 Thread drh
Andrew Finkenstadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any objections to taking back patches that bit-wise and the result of the overflowing addition with 0xff ? The variables being added are unsigned chars and the result is stored in an unsigned char. Am I to understand that you have a compiler that

Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4-based random (3.3.15)

2007-05-15 Thread Andrew Finkenstadt
On 5/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Finkenstadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any objections to taking back patches that bit-wise and the result of the overflowing addition with 0xff ? The variables being added are unsigned chars and the result is stored in an unsigned

RE: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4-based random (3.3.15)

2007-05-15 Thread James Dennett
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:35 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4- based random (3.3.15) Andrew Finkenstadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any

Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4-based random (3.3.15)

2007-05-15 Thread Andrew Finkenstadt
On 5/15/07, James Dennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:35 PM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in RC4- based random (3.3.15)