Andrew Finkenstadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any objections to taking back patches that bit-wise and the result of the
overflowing addition with 0xff ?
The variables being added are unsigned chars and the result
is stored in an unsigned char. Am I to understand that you have
a compiler that
On 5/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Finkenstadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any objections to taking back patches that bit-wise and the result of
the
overflowing addition with 0xff ?
The variables being added are unsigned chars and the result
is stored in an unsigned
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:35 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in
RC4-
based random (3.3.15)
Andrew Finkenstadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any
On 5/15/07, James Dennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 3:35 PM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: Re: [sqlite] runtime errors in DEBUG with byte overflow in
RC4-
based random (3.3.15)