On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Duane Wessels wrote:
> So the hack was put in place to accomodate this broken client
> (if it is the situation I am thinking of).
In any case it is gone now.
If such problem resurfaces it needs to be dealt with in some other manner.
Regards
Henrik
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> There is a section in the clientProcessRequest2() on cache hit processing
> relating to the no-cache flags on requests for STORE_PENDING objects which
> I do not quite get what it is about, and the CVS log comment does not make
> me any wiser.. wha
