Re: A few patches

2007-03-13 Thread Steven
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: tis 2007-03-13 klockan 14:50 +0900 skrev Steven: The third patch (transparent-pipeline.patch) is designed to allow squid to handle non-http traffic. If a request can not be decoded by squid, and it was a transparently intercepted requets, it

RE: A few patches

2007-03-13 Thread Steven Wilton
> -Original Message- > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 9:30 AM > To: Steven Wilton > Cc: 'Adrian Chadd'; squid-dev@squid-cache.org > Subject: RE: A few patches > > tis 2007-03-13 klockan 15:46 +0900 skrev Steven Wilton: > > > Good point.

MemPool and acl_ip_data

2007-03-13 Thread squid3
Is there anyone able to give me a good description of the how-and-why of MemPool? specifically the MEMPOOL_CLASS() macros and acl_ip_data. I have a segfault occuring when an acl_ip_data object is created. Following several others which appear properly, but definately during the new() somewhere in

Re: A few patches

2007-03-13 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2007-03-13 klockan 14:50 +0900 skrev Steven: > The third patch (transparent-pipeline.patch) is designed to allow squid to > handle non-http traffic. If a request can not be decoded by squid, and it > was a transparently intercepted requets, it will be transformed to a > CONNECT request to

RE: A few patches

2007-03-13 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
tis 2007-03-13 klockan 15:46 +0900 skrev Steven Wilton: > Good point. The only problem is that (under Linux at least) we can't find > out the original destination port (ie if traffic destined for port 80 is > redirected to port 3128). conn->me has the original IP and port in transparently interc

RE: A few patches

2007-03-13 Thread Steven Wilton
> -Original Message- > From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2007 4:59 PM > To: Steven Wilton > Cc: 'Adrian Chadd'; squid-dev@squid-cache.org > Subject: Re: A few patches > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Steven Wilton wrote: > > > Good point. The only problem i

A few patches

2007-03-13 Thread Steven Wilton
I've attached 3 patches to this message for comment. The first patch (transparent-pipeline.patch) is simple - I'd like to allow NTLM auth to work even when pipelined requests are enabled, but only for transparent requests. I think that this is a safe option, as the web browser thinks it's talk

Re: A few patches

2007-03-13 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007, Steven Wilton wrote: > Good point. The only problem is that (under Linux at least) we can't find > out the original destination port (ie if traffic destined for port 80 is > redirected to port 3128). Would you suggest this as a configuration option > on a per-port basis? (i