Hi all,
Alex Rousskov wrote:
The primary idea behind RC1 is to bring in users who are ignoring PRE
releases because there were so many PREs. We need more testers than a
handful of folks running PREs on busy sites.
RC1 release to attract testers is a good idea. The only comment I have
is that
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:59 +0300, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Hi all,
Alex Rousskov wrote:
The primary idea behind RC1 is to bring in users who are ignoring PRE
releases because there were so many PREs. We need more testers than a
handful of folks running PREs on busy sites.
RC1
Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:59 +0300, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Hi all,
Alex Rousskov wrote:
The primary idea behind RC1 is to bring in users who are ignoring PRE
releases because there were so many PREs. We need more testers than a
handful of folks running PREs on busy
Is anyone able to help me with this configure problem?
The goal is to have it test for a functions existence and if present
define HAVE_function and add lib/function.$obj to the compile options.
As far as I understand autoconf; I thought these checks as written below
would do exactly that
Never mind. 5 mins more thought found a working solution.
Amos
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:59 +0300, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
RC1 release to attract testers is a good idea. The only comment I have
is that it is still summer and some of squid code submitters are still
in vacations so 1 or 2 developers get more load .
Maybe September is a better
On tor, 2007-08-16 at 23:51 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Is anyone able to help me with this configure problem?
The goal is to have it test for a functions existence and if present
define HAVE_function and add lib/function.$obj to the compile options.
As far as I understand autoconf; I
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2003
There's a patch that looks pretty straightforward; can this be
incorporated?
Thanks,
--
Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On tor, 2007-08-16 at 23:51 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Is anyone able to help me with this configure problem?
The goal is to have it test for a functions existence and if present
define HAVE_function and add lib/function.$obj to the compile options.
As far as I understand autoconf; I
Hi Amos,
At 07.25 15/08/2007, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Hi Amos,
Not good news here ... :-(
We have a problem:
You have used getaddrinfo() and freeaddrinfo() functions, but on
Windows they are available only starting from Windows XP. This means
that your code, even if compiled
On fre, 2007-08-17 at 14:23 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Thanks Henrik.
I couldn't find the AC_REPLACE_FUNCS outside a special library test
(there is a long list for header file checks).
???
my configure.in reads
AC_SUBST(LIBREGEX)
AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(\
drand48 \
tempnam \
On fre, 2007-08-17 at 10:48 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2003
There's a patch that looks pretty straightforward; can this be
incorporated?
done.
Regards
Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
+1... silly Northern hemisphere.
On 2007/08/16, at 7:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 11:59 +0300, Tsantilas Christos wrote:
Hi all,
Alex Rousskov wrote:
The primary idea behind RC1 is to bring in users who are ignoring
PRE
releases because there were so many PREs. We
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 10:21 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
What I'm hoping for is to have a paragraph for each class about where
its
intended to be used etc.
That would be terrific! I was trying to provide that for the classes I
was adding.
Theres lots of little bits still need doing for
14 matches
Mail list logo
