> On ons, 2007-09-26 at 11:16 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> That would require another directory just for the cf.data.pre content.
>
> Yes, and a small script to pull it togeter for the build. (found in
> scripts/)
>
>> I take it you've included the dependancy tracking in your merge script.
>
>
On ons, 2007-09-26 at 11:16 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> That would require another directory just for the cf.data.pre content.
Yes, and a small script to pull it togeter for the build. (found in
scripts/)
> I take it you've included the dependancy tracking in your merge script.
cf.data.pre wi
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:08 -0400, Richard Bishop wrote:
>
>> I would suggest that there should be an option to bypass particular
>> services based on the results of earlier services - i.e. values of
>> ICAP headers returned in the response. In the case of multiple
>> chained virus scanners, thi
> On tis, 2007-09-25 at 23:38 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I propose we change cf.data.pre to be split up in multiple files in
>> the
>> > CVS repository. Imho this would simplify maintenance noticeably.
>>
>> One file per option, or
On mån, 2007-09-24 at 16:24 +0200, Francisco Gimeno wrote:
> It's a patch for a directive supporting inserting a flow into a
> delay_pool based on the file size.
> At the moment it only acts whenever the flow has dispatched that
> amount of bytes (so it burst at the beggining till match the size,
> Sorry for the rest, I lost private contact with Amos...
>
> Amos, your server is filtering ours, and I can read, but no send you any
> message... Could you check the list your servers are asking ?
>
I found a few of these died this week. Should not be used anymore from now.
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 13:08 -0400, Richard Bishop wrote:
> Between sending email my and receiving your I have been having a play
> around with this idea. I've gotten to the point where I have multiple
> ICAP services being processed for REQMOD methods
Glad you made it work for your needs!
> tho
Alex,
Firstly, please disregard some of what I said in my previous email. Having had
another good look over the code I've identified that I did make some mistakes
in my interpretations. The statement posted on the 3.x developer guide - "The
code is often difficult to follow because there are
On tis, 2007-09-25 at 23:38 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I propose we change cf.data.pre to be split up in multiple files in the
> > CVS repository. Imho this would simplify maintenance noticeably.
>
> One file per option, or?
Yes.
R
I've done a bit of work to reduce the use of memcpy() in the client-side
section. Its in the "store_copy" branch in sourceforge.
The first part of this creates storeClientRef() which is like
storeClientCopy() but it returns a reference-counted mem_node reference+
offset rather than filling a suppl
Sorry for the rest, I lost private contact with Amos...
Amos, your server is filtering ours, and I can read, but no send you any
message... Could you check the list your servers are asking ?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host rio.treenetnz.com[60.234.233.111] said: 554
5.7.1
Service unavailabl
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007, Francisco Gimeno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think that I have sent this before, but Henrik asked me to do it as
> somebody could be interested.
aha!
> It's a patch for a directive supporting inserting a flow into a
> delay_pool based on the file size.
> At the moment it only act
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose we change cf.data.pre to be split up in multiple files in the
> CVS repository. Imho this would simplify maintenance noticeably.
One file per option, or?
Adrian
Hi,
I propose we change cf.data.pre to be split up in multiple files in the
CVS repository. Imho this would simplify maintenance noticeably.
There is already scripts for splitting and merging cf.data.pre in the
scripts directory. To see what I am talking about run
mkdir conf
../scripts/split
Thanks!
On 2007/09/21, at 7:19 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On tor, 2007-09-20 at 11:29 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007, Mark Nottingham wrote:
... are messed up; I think this is a known problem (or at least I
remember talking to somebody about it), but I didn't see anything in
15 matches
Mail list logo