Re: Another wiki page about Squid plans

2007-10-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
Alex Rousskov wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 13:40 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 22:35 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: There are currently at least three wiki pages describing Squid3 development plans: 1) http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Squid-3.0 2)

Re: Another wiki page about Squid plans

2007-10-06 Thread Alex Rousskov
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 09:20 +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: On Fri, Oct 05, 2007, Alex Rousskov wrote: I am trying to minimize the number of pages talking essentially about the same thing (see above)... I also found: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/DevelopmentIdeas

Re: squid3-ipv6 squid3/lib GNUregex.c,1.5.4.1,1.5.4.2

2007-10-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
This is non-IPv6 code. That should all be identical to HEAD. Amos Guido Serassio wrote: Update of cvs.devel.squid-cache.org:/cvsroot/squid/squid3/lib Modified Files: Tag: squid3-ipv6 GNUregex.c Log Message: Update the Windows glue for IPv6 changes Index: GNUregex.c

Re: Another wiki page about Squid plans

2007-10-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On fre, 2007-10-05 at 13:40 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: I just found http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Plans page that you have created a month ago. Should this be merged with Squid2 or Squid3 roadmaps? Linked from http://wiki.squid-cache.org/RoadMap ? Or should we have a catch all page for

Re: Another wiki page about Squid plans

2007-10-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On lör, 2007-10-06 at 09:23 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: Not sure how to interpret the don't do that and great you are tidying this up conflict :-). Should I start moving/merging things around? Is there a better plan? Don't stop. Have given it a whole 5 seconds though on what we need to make

Re: Migrating to Subversion

2007-10-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On lör, 2007-10-06 at 07:35 +1000, Robert Collins wrote: Pros: + Many consider svn to be overall better than CVS. Its branch model is terrible. Well, it's not worse than CVS imho, but not noticeably better either. The CVS model of branches/tags is reasonable to work with, but

Re: Migrating to Subversion

2007-10-06 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On sön, 2007-10-07 at 03:47 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: bzr and git is the only two left standing on my list of choices. Neither is perfect, but both significantly better than most other.. with bzr being the main candidate. On a related note the Samba project is currently migrating to

Re: Migrating to Subversion

2007-10-06 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 03:51 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On sön, 2007-10-07 at 03:47 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: bzr and git is the only two left standing on my list of choices. Neither is perfect, but both significantly better than most other.. with bzr being the main candidate.