Build failed in Hudson: 3.1-i386-Debian-sid #21

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.1-i386-Debian-sid/21/ -- Started by user amos Building remotely on rio.treenet bzr: ERROR: Invalid http response for http://www.squid-cache.org/bzr/squid3/branches/SQUID_3_1/.bzr/branch-format: Bad status line

Hudson build is back to normal: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #120

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3/120/changes

Re: assert(e-mem_status == NOT_IN_MEMORY) versus TCP_MEM_HIT.

sön 2009-09-27 klockan 12:55 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: Ah, okay gotcha. So... (c) for people needing a quick patch. (b) to be committed (to meet 3.2 performance goals, saving uselsss disk operations, etc etc). The number of times 'b' as discussed here will be hit is negliable. Not

Re: Build failed in Hudson: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #118

sön 2009-09-27 klockan 03:02 +0200 skrev n...@squid-cache.org: [Henrik Nordstrom hen...@henriknordstrom.net] Make ESI parser modules expat and libxml2 dependent on their libraries The ESI parser system is actually pluggable. There is no reason we should require expat and libxml2. Just

Hudson build is back to normal: 2.HEAD-amd64-FreeBSD-7.2 #247

See http://build.squid-cache.org/job/2.HEAD-amd64-FreeBSD-7.2/247/

Re: assert(e-mem_status == NOT_IN_MEMORY) versus TCP_MEM_HIT.

On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:16:29 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom hen...@henriknordstrom.net wrote: sön 2009-09-27 klockan 12:55 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries: Ah, okay gotcha. So... (c) for people needing a quick patch. (b) to be committed (to meet 3.2 performance goals, saving uselsss disk

Re: [noc] Build failed in Hudson: 3.HEAD-amd64-CentOS-5.3 #118

On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 22:41:51 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom hen...@henriknordstrom.net wrote: sön 2009-09-27 klockan 03:02 +0200 skrev n...@squid-cache.org: [Henrik Nordstrom hen...@henriknordstrom.net] Make ESI parser modules expat and libxml2 dependent on their libraries The ESI parser system

Re: Segfault in HTCP CLR request on 64-bit

I have opened a bug for this issue here: http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2788 Also, the previous patch was not generated against head so I re-rolled the patch against current head and attached to the bug report. --Jason - Original Message - From: Adrian Chadd