Re: [MERGE] Rename enable-linux-netfilter to enable-nf-transparent

2010-08-01 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 07/31/2010 04:27 PM, Andrew Beverley wrote: I'd like to propose the attached patch, to rename the build option --enable-linux-netfilter to --enable-nf-transparent. This is for 2 reasons: 1. It is consistent with the remainder of the transparent proxy options (ifpw-transparent,

Re: [MERGE] Rename enable-linux-netfilter to enable-nf-transparent

2010-08-01 Thread Andrew Beverley
I'm not sure its fully worth doing this. * the transparent options are all due for a naming upgrade or removal in the next major release anyway. Okay, I'm happy to leave as is. However, I would still suggest a review of the naming in the upgrade (see below). * linux-netfilter in fact

[MERGE] Rename enable-linux-netfilter to enable-nf-transparent

2010-07-31 Thread Andrew Beverley
I'd like to propose the attached patch, to rename the build option --enable-linux-netfilter to --enable-nf-transparent. This is for 2 reasons: 1. It is consistent with the remainder of the transparent proxy options (ifpw-transparent, ipf-transparent, pf-transparent). 2. It causes less confusion

Re: [MERGE] Rename enable-linux-netfilter to enable-nf-transparent

2010-07-31 Thread Amos Jeffries
Andrew Beverley wrote: I'd like to propose the attached patch, to rename the build option --enable-linux-netfilter to --enable-nf-transparent. This is for 2 reasons: 1. It is consistent with the remainder of the transparent proxy options (ifpw-transparent, ipf-transparent, pf-transparent). 2.

Re: [MERGE] Rename enable-linux-netfilter to enable-nf-transparent

2010-07-31 Thread Kinkie
Also, would you mind waiting until autoconf-refactor lands to trunk? It is a largish change, and changing trunk now would make merging harder. If all goes right, I'll submit a merge candidate on Friday for review, and if there's no issues I hope to merge next Sunday.. Thanks! On 8/1/10, Amos