Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hi there,
I went through the remaining Squid3 non-enhancement bug reports
targeted for 3.0. For most bugs, I was able to close or comment in the
bugzilla. The following bugs are special because the questions did not
seem appropriate for bugzilla. Please review.
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hi there,
I went through the remaining Squid3 non-enhancement bug reports
targeted for 3.0. For most bugs, I was able to close or comment in the
bugzilla. The following bugs are special because the questions did not
seem appropriate for bugzilla. Please review.
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 03:27 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Here is the patch for that additional ICAP problem that came to light
testing cppunit removal.
Committed.
Thank you,
Alex.
Hi there,
I went through the remaining Squid3 non-enhancement bug reports
targeted for 3.0. For most bugs, I was able to close or comment in the
bugzilla. The following bugs are special because the questions did not
seem appropriate for bugzilla. Please review.
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Hi there,
I went through the remaining Squid3 non-enhancement bug reports
targeted for 3.0. For most bugs, I was able to close or comment in the
bugzilla. The following bugs are special because the questions did not
seem appropriate for bugzilla. Please review.
tor 2007-04-12 klockan 11:42 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1475
Bug 1475 - File descriptor limit does work.
I am not sure what the final resolution for this bug is. Henrik?
Adrian?
Closing..
ESI bugs targeted for 3.0
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 01:40 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
yay! this has been causing me some nightmares just thinking about
it.
I'll get onto a purge this weekend unless there is anyone else who
wants
to do it or veto it.
Speak up within 8 hours or I'll create a 'nocpp' branch and
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 12:45 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has not been linked to the cppunit testers, but I have written a
specific test app to check each function and proivide for maula-eye
check
in increments from simplest up for both ipv4-pure then dual protocol
paths.
Then it has
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 12:45 +1200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has not been linked to the cppunit testers, but I have written a
specific test app to check each function and proivide for maula-eye
check
in increments from simplest up for both ipv4-pure then dual protocol
paths.
Then it has
