Greetings to everybody!
if I re./configure squid with some other features enabled or disabled,
Am I going to loose the previously set features? or just add the new
features with old ones? hope your opinion.
thanks in advance
Mohan
It's great to see RC releases of Squid 3.0.
One of the things I heard would be possible with Squid 3.0 is to have
Squid accept HTTPS requests and to pass these on to an origin server
as HTTP requests and the reverse effect with responses, so:
client -- https request -- Squid -- http request--
Hi
There is a file I'm trying to download via my proxy, but cant ...
squid loggs show
1191409989.051 0 192.168.2.203 TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT/404 615 GET
http://www.coltech.co.za/pnp/files/vPbPsCrVJ/SFUP-V447B4-D.zip greg
NONE/- text/html
If i bypass the proxy I can download the file fine ... what
Hi!
I'm looking for a way to make some basic benchmarks of squid. I'm mostly
interested in see how many requests/second my squid setup is able to
handle.
¿in wich order of magnitude those numbers should be?
¿How much requests a normal (out of the box?) installation of squid is
able to handle
Mohan Jayaweera wrote:
Greetings to everybody!
if I re./configure squid with some other features enabled or disabled,
Am I going to loose the previously set features? or just add the new
features with old ones? hope your opinion.
thanks in advance
Mohan
Depends on what you mean by 'configure'.
revathi ganesh wrote:
Hello Gurus,
I have stopped viewing video files..but now unable to
view even flash pictures such as greeting cards etc..
I have done the following in squid.conf
---
acl audiofiles req_mime_type -i ^audio/.*
I had a question about how most people were deploying their squid
caches, are you deploying them behind firewalls and is so what type
of rule set are you using? Is there any case where someone is
running the firewall and squid cache on the same box? I am running
Squid on a Solaris 10.
TIA
Hi Joseph,
Joseph Jenkins wrote:
I had a question about how most people were deploying their squid
caches, are you deploying them behind firewalls and is so what type
of rule set are you using? Is there any case where someone is
running the firewall and squid cache on the same box? I am
Greetings,
I just upgraded to stable 16. My squid dies with the following error:
Oct 3 09:42:49 server01 squid[12275]: [ID 702911 daemon.alert]
xcalloc: Unable to allocate 1 blocks of 4108 bytes!
It does this consistently when I hit around 3GB of cache usage.
I have plenty of RAM (32GB),
Hi Sekar,
Sekar wrote:
Hello All,
I have a problem when i run the squid-3.0.RC1-20071003.tar.gz with c-icap.
Possibly it is a configuration problem.
I have downloaded the c-icap from
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/c-icap/c_icap-180407.tar.gz
I ran the c-icap with default c
Hi all,
I've been doing some high performance testing with squid (2.6) and
if you use enough hardware the problem shifts to being with network
connections (for me at least). Above around 300 RPS on a unit with latency
on both sides and many clients you start to chew up network buffers (on
Bruce Badger wrote:
It's great to see RC releases of Squid 3.0.
One of the things I heard would be possible with Squid 3.0 is to have
Squid accept HTTPS requests and to pass these on to an origin server
as HTTP requests and the reverse effect with responses, so:
client -- https request --
Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi
There is a file I'm trying to download via my proxy, but cant ...
squid loggs show
1191409989.051 0 192.168.2.203 TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT/404 615 GET
http://www.coltech.co.za/pnp/files/vPbPsCrVJ/SFUP-V447B4-D.zip greg
NONE/- text/html
If i bypass the proxy I can download
Hi,
The list has been very quiet w/ regards to the coss storage.
1. is it still being developed/maintained?
2. is it production ready?
mike
I had a question about how most people were deploying their squid
caches, are you deploying them behind firewalls and is so what type
of rule set are you using? Is there any case where someone is
running the firewall and squid cache on the same box? I am running
Squid on a Solaris 10.
I
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, leongmzlist wrote:
Hi,
The list has been very quiet w/ regards to the coss storage.
1. is it still being developed/maintained?
2. is it production ready?
From the reports from people using it, COSS is good enough to use for small
objects a hundred or so kilobytes.
I remember reading somewhere coss will be removed from the 3.0
release, just want to make sure it's won't get abandoned since our
cache data is really important to us.
mike
At 03:58 PM 10/3/2007, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, leongmzlist wrote:
Hi,
The list has been very quiet
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007, leongmzlist wrote:
I remember reading somewhere coss will be removed from the 3.0
release, just want to make sure it's won't get abandoned since our
cache data is really important to us.
Squid-2 won't be abandoned for quite a while. If someone wants to sponsor
forward
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 15:57 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The visible hostname must match the one inside the certificate or the
certificate will be seen as invalid. hostname is set either in the OS
configuration /etc/hostname, or overridden in squid.conf with
visible_hostname.
Hmm.. thought
On tis, 2007-10-02 at 23:32 +0100, Robert French wrote:
seems to have developed a problem when accessing HTTPS sites that require a
certificate. When browsing to the site, it prompts for which certificate to
use, then gives a little warning about how the hostname does not match the
URL and
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 10:40 +0100, Bruce Badger wrote:
It's great to see RC releases of Squid 3.0.
One of the things I heard would be possible with Squid 3.0 is to have
Squid accept HTTPS requests and to pass these on to an origin server
as HTTP requests and the reverse effect with
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 07:28 -0700, Joseph Jenkins wrote:
I had a question about how most people were deploying their squid
caches, are you deploying them behind firewalls and is so what type
of rule set are you using? Is there any case where someone is
running the firewall and squid cache on
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 10:02 -0700, Frank Ruiz wrote:
Greetings,
I just upgraded to stable 16. My squid dies with the following error:
Oct 3 09:42:49 server01 squid[12275]: [ID 702911 daemon.alert]
xcalloc: Unable to allocate 1 blocks of 4108 bytes!
It does this consistently when I
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 17:19 -0700, leongmzlist wrote:
I remember reading somewhere coss will be removed from the 3.0
release, just want to make sure it's won't get abandoned since our
cache data is really important to us.
It's not removed, but downgraded to experimental for 3.0, with updated
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 15:57 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
The visible hostname must match the one inside the certificate or the
certificate will be seen as invalid. hostname is set either in the OS
configuration /etc/hostname, or overridden in squid.conf with
visible_hostname.
Hmm.. thought
On ons, 2007-10-03 at 10:40 +0100, Bruce Badger wrote:
It's great to see RC releases of Squid 3.0.
One of the things I heard would be possible with Squid 3.0 is to have
Squid accept HTTPS requests and to pass these on to an origin server
as HTTP requests and the reverse effect with
On tor, 2007-10-04 at 15:20 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote:
https_port 3127 cert=/test/squid.pem key=/test/squid.key
defaultsite=treenet.co.nz
cache_peer *** 80 0 originserver
...
Then requested https://192.168.0.192:3127/; in the browser to grab from
the test cache. I kept getting
Hi list,
I am working on a Microsoft SharePoint/IIS setup that doesn't want to
provide the correct caching headers. This is a deliberate design
feature from the people in Redmond, but it is not what we want to
have.
Due to the fact images are handled by SharePoint they leave the IIS
server with
hi
can anybody help me ..
i want to create another delay pool from these 2 class
my current config is
# delay pool
delay_pools 2
#direct bandwitdhfull access to websites
delay_class 1 2
delay_parameters 1 -1/-1 -1/-1
delay_access 1 allow fast
delay_access 1 deny all
# delay
#restrict
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Leongmzlist,
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 14:57:17 -0700
leongmzlist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The list has been very quiet w/ regards to the coss storage.
1. is it still being developed/maintained?
2. is it production ready?
I am using COSS
30 matches
Mail list logo
