[squid-users] ZPH support

2008-06-28 Thread Armin ranjbar
Dear all, Why there is no ZPH support for squid3 ? -- Armin ranjbar , System Administrator

Re: [squid-users] ZPH support

2008-06-28 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On lör, 2008-06-28 at 11:12 +0430, Armin ranjbar wrote: Why there is no ZPH support for squid3 ? Because no one has contributed ZPH support to Squid-3. Regards Henrik signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: squid_kerb_auth on mac os x

2008-06-28 Thread Malte Schröder
With Windows 2003 SP2 you can set a flag (I think in UserAccountControl property) for the computer account that stops AD from adding the group-information to the service-ticket. I found it somewhere in their knowledgebase, but currently don't remember the details. I have been searching for quite

[squid-users] Re: Re: Re: squid_kerb_auth on mac os x

2008-06-28 Thread Markus Moeller
Malte, are you saying it works now, becuase you used the AD flag or because you increased the buffer ? I would be curios if the buffer increase would fix it. If it didn't fix it some buffers in squid need to be increased too (e.g. in auth_negotiate.c). Thank you Markus Malte Schröder

Re: [squid-users] ZPH support

2008-06-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On lör, 2008-06-28 at 11:12 +0430, Armin ranjbar wrote: Why there is no ZPH support for squid3 ? Because no one has contributed ZPH support to Squid-3. Define 'support'. We use the word in several ways here. - ZPH provide no patch? 3.1 ... because its been

Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: Re: squid_kerb_auth on mac os x

2008-06-28 Thread Malte Schröder
I think at first I increased some buffers but hit a wall when the Proxy-Authenticate header got too long. I don't remember the limit, could have been something around 8k chars. On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:19:41 +0100 Markus Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Malte, are you saying it works now,

[squid-users] purge domain / more flexible purge ?

2008-06-28 Thread Roy M.
Hello, A past discussion in list back to the year of 2001 said not possible: http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200112/0880.html Any updates now? Consider the following case: You have a blog application, and use Squid as reverse proxy to cache the dynamic pages. Ideally,

Re: [squid-users] bypass proxy for local addresses

2008-06-28 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 27.06.08 07:40, Shaine wrote: For instance , if squid runs in port 8080 , when a specific url comes into the squid via port 8080 , before it receives to port 8080 cant we redirect to a web server , which that url searching? From the squid itself cant we find a solutions to have a proxy

Re: [squid-users] bypass proxy for local addresses

2008-06-28 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 28.06.08 18:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: There is no such think in HTTP protocol oops, thing ;) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek

Re: [squid-users] Re: How to make the prefetched file cached ?

2008-06-28 Thread WestWind
Thanks for henrik's advice, I am running a file server that often requested by multi-thread download tools, if squid can prefetch and cache files, It will make my back-end server do less work. I find some email lists talking about this matter here:

Re: [squid-users] Re: How to make the prefetched file cached ?

2008-06-28 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On sön, 2008-06-29 at 01:24 +0800, WestWind wrote: Thanks for henrik's advice, I am running a file server that often requested by multi-thread download tools, if squid can prefetch and cache files, It will make my back-end server do less work. I find some email lists talking about this

Re: [squid-users] ZPH support

2008-06-28 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On sön, 2008-06-29 at 01:01 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: Henrik Nordstrom wrote: On lör, 2008-06-28 at 11:12 +0430, Armin ranjbar wrote: Why there is no ZPH support for squid3 ? Because no one has contributed ZPH support to Squid-3. Define 'support'. We use the word in several

Re: [squid-users] purge domain / more flexible purge ?

2008-06-28 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On lör, 2008-06-28 at 23:40 +0800, Roy M. wrote: Hello, A past discussion in list back to the year of 2001 said not possible: http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/200112/0880.html Any updates now? Same situation. The fundamentals of Squid is still the same. Ideally, if

[squid-users] Squid-2.7.STABLE3 is available

2008-06-28 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is pleased to announce the availability of the Squid-2.7.STABLE3 release! This release corrects several bugs found in the previous release, including two which may be considered security related in some installations: * Bug #2122: Private information leakage in

[squid-users] Squid-2.6.STABLE21 is available

2008-06-28 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is pleased to announce the availability of the Squid-2.6.STABLE21 legacy maintenance release. This release corrects several bugs found in the previous 2.6 release, including two which may be considered security related in some installations: * Bug #2122: Private

[squid-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: squid_kerb_auth on mac os x

2008-06-28 Thread Markus Moeller
Would you mind testing with an increased buffer of 32k in squid-2/src/auth/negotiate/auth_negotiate.c and in squid_kerb_auth.c ? Thank you Markus Malte Schröder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think at first I increased some buffers but hit a wall when the

Re: [squid-users] purge domain / more flexible purge ?

2008-06-28 Thread Jeff Peng
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Roy M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You have a blog application, and use Squid as reverse proxy to cache the dynamic pages. How do you cache the dynamic pages? ignore Cache-Control: private headers or something like that? I once used mod_rewrite to rewrite some

Re: [squid-users] upgrading from squid 2.6 to 2.7

2008-06-28 Thread Manoj_Rajkarnikar
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Adrian Chadd wrote: Besides whatever changes are in the release notes, I think you'll be fine. I tried reasonably hard to make 2.6 - 2.7 a seamless update; the only surprises could be the storeUpdate stuff which Henrik included near the end of the development cycle. That