On 06.02.09 10:28, ░▒▓ ɹɐzǝupɐɥʞ ɐzɹıɯ ▓▒░ wrote:
i guess there is no solution ?
There maybe is, but It seems that nobody here knows, wants to tell, or has
noticed this thread...
I'd like such functionality too. But I'll use clamav yet ;)
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:27 AM, ░▒▓ ɹɐzǝupɐɥʞ ɐzɹıɯ
On 06.02.09 13:29, Mikio Kishi wrote:
I'd like to build the transparent proxy environment using squid3 +
tproxy (http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/).
I researched it on the Internet, but I didn't know which combination
of each (squid, tproxy, and also linux kernel)
M. Asghar Nazir wrote:
Dear All friends,
I am new with squid installation and setup. I have installed two NIC cards in my pc! one with public address and one with my local LAN address scheme. I have successfully installed squid on my linux machine. When I configure mozilla firefox browser
Hello Amos,
| I would have thought Squid-DG-Internet would be sufficient to meet those
| needs. With the front squid doing cache+auth of stuff that gets past the
| DG filtering. (and DG doing less work on cacheable things its already
| scanned once).
I tried that too. But it does not work.
Hello.
We are using large squid cluster (~30 dedicated machines with squid) to
proxy-caching static content.
All separate squid's configured as sibling (each other, i.e. one level
hierarchy).
All requests to squid-machines go through one balancer. Balancer check
each squid (alive/not
Add this line to your iptables..
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s 192.168.0.0/24 --dport 80 -j
REDIRECT --to 3128
Regards,
Farzan Q.
-Original Message-
From: jjrowan [mailto:squid_u...@rownetco.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 2:42 PM
To:
Chris Robertson wrote:
vivian t wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Chris Robertson crobert...@gci.net
wrote:
vivian t wrote:
hello
when i try to surf any site from any pc i start the squid server in
debug level 1
and found this lines
commBind: cannot bind socket FD 14 to
Takahiro Kambe wrote:
Hi,
In message 49897042.7070...@treenet.co.nz
on Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:38:58 +1300,
Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
__
Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2009:1
Ricardo Nuno wrote:
Hello Amos,
| I would have thought Squid-DG-Internet would be sufficient to meet those
| needs. With the front squid doing cache+auth of stuff that gets past the
| DG filtering. (and DG doing less work on cacheable things its already
| scanned once).
I tried that too.
| Ah, okay, here is what I think is happening:
| Squid1 does the ntlm auth, and converts it to BasicAuth for DG.
| So Squid2 gets the BasicAuth form. which means at Squid2 the other
| dummy_auth is needed to catch and log basic login details.
Yes! That has it. Just used the dummy_auth for the
Chris Robertson wrote:
Anthony DeMatteis wrote:
Hi group,
Has anyone played with limiting bandwidth via squid? I currently have
three bandwidth managers between my border router and customer base.
These servers limit traffic based on service customer has selected
(1.5M/768k, etc). There are
Jamie Orzechowski wrote:
I have installed squid 2/7/3.0/3.1 and having the same issues with
hotmail on all versions.
My Squid is setup as a transparent proxy.
When going to http://www.hotmail.com via firefox there are no issues.
Click login and the mailbox appears.
Using IE users can
Jeff Peng wrote:
I have tested squid-3.0.stable13 for round-robin loadbalancing.
I found it behaves as not the same as the before version of 3.0 branch.
For example, there are two backend servers, server A and server B.
From squid to server A the connection is fast, but to server B the
Wolfgang Scheicher wrote:
I'm trying to find ways to reduce the traffic caused by the rather bandwith
intense Software updates.
I found quite some posts in this list that discuss the problems, like
downloads being split up into parts and requested from various locations, and
that it could be
In message 498c18a4.5020...@treenet.co.nz
on Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:01:56 +1300,
Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
__
Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2009:1
Evgeniy Zaitsev wrote:
Hello.
We are using large squid cluster (~30 dedicated machines with squid) to
proxy-caching static content.
All separate squid's configured as sibling (each other, i.e. one level
hierarchy).
All requests to squid-machines go through one balancer. Balancer check
░▒▓ ɹɐzǝupɐɥʞ ɐzɹıɯ ▓▒░ wrote:
tail -f /var/log/squid/cache.log
2009/02/06 12:22:50| httpRequestBodyHandler: Likely proxy abuse
detected '192.168.222.100' -
'http://upload.facebook.com/photos_upload.php'
can someone translate me to human language ?
whats wrong with that ?
lol, reading the
Ricardo Nuno wrote:
| Ah, okay, here is what I think is happening:
| Squid1 does the ntlm auth, and converts it to BasicAuth for DG.
| So Squid2 gets the BasicAuth form. which means at Squid2 the other
| dummy_auth is needed to catch and log basic login details.
Yes! That has it. Just used
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 06.02.09 13:29, Mikio Kishi wrote:
I'd like to build the transparent proxy environment using squid3 +
tproxy (http://www.balabit.com/support/community/products/tproxy/).
I researched it on the Internet, but I didn't know which combination
of each (squid,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:21:50PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 03.02.09 21:18, Vikram Goyal wrote:
I want to anonymize surfing for that I have squid version 3.0 running in
transparent mode. I have
request_header_access From deny all
request_header_access Referer deny all
lör 2009-02-07 klockan 02:03 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Evgeniy Zaitsev wrote:
Hello.
We are using large squid cluster (~30 dedicated machines with squid) to
proxy-caching static content.
All separate squid's configured as sibling (each other, i.e. one level
hierarchy).
All
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:28:45AM +0700, ? z??up?? ??z??
? wrote:
i guess there is no solution ?
You can download safebrowsing db and use it locally.
Check some examples:
Ich bin bis 08.02.2009 abwesend
Ich bin vom 02.02.2009 bis zum 06.02.2009 leider nicht im Haus. Ich werde
mich um Ihr Anliegen ab den 09.02.2009 wieder kümmern können.
Wenn es sich um eine wichtige Mitteilung handelt, so rufen Sie bitte unsere
Hotline unter 040/5588- an.
Hinweis: Dies ist
Hello Squid gurus and mortals, I have a curious situation. I upgraded my
Apache2 (2.2.11). Out-of-the-box: ./configure; make; make install without
touching any .conf file I now have the following condition with 3 domains: A, B
and C. My question: is the Squid-cache holding these pages in memory
Woodward, Andrew wrote:
Hi group,
I'd like to reduce the amount of information being set to access.log so
that only requests that's come back !200 are logged. I figure that I can
use:
acl HTTPnot200 http_status !200
access_log /usr/local/squid/var/logs/access.log squid HTTPnot200
access_log
da...@davidwbrown.name wrote:
Hello Squid gurus and mortals, I have a curious situation. I upgraded my
Apache2 (2.2.11). Out-of-the-box: ./configure; make; make install without
touching any .conf file I now have the following condition with 3 domains: A, B
and C. My question: is the
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
lör 2009-02-07 klockan 02:03 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
Evgeniy Zaitsev wrote:
Hello.
We are using large squid cluster (~30 dedicated machines with squid) to
proxy-caching static content.
All separate squid's configured as sibling (each other, i.e. one level
sorry i dont understand...
can you expliant more ?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Amos Jeffries squ...@treenet.co.nz wrote:
░▒▓ ɹɐzǝupɐɥʞ ɐzɹıɯ ▓▒░ wrote:
tail -f /var/log/squid/cache.log
2009/02/06 12:22:50| httpRequestBodyHandler: Likely proxy abuse
detected '192.168.222.100' -
sorry i dont understand much
can you give me the example ?
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Henrik K h...@hege.li wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:28:45AM +0700, ? z??up?? ??z??
? wrote:
i guess there is no solution ?
You can download safebrowsing db and use it
29 matches
Mail list logo
